Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31328008›Full record

ArticlePsychologica Belgica2019

Does Change in Attention Control Mediate the Impact of tDCS on Attentional Bias for Threat? Limited Evidence from a Double-blind Sham-controlled Experiment in an Unselected Sample.

Charlotte Coussement, Pierre Maurage, Joël Billieux, Alexandre Heeren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychologica Belgica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charlotte CoussementCellule de Recherche et Publications Scientifiques (CRPS), Hôpital Psychiatrique du Beau Vallon, Namur, BE.
Pierre MauragePsychological Science Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BE.
Joël BillieuxIntegrative Research Unit on Social and Individual Development (INSIDE), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, LU.
Alexandre HeerenPsychological Science Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BE.ORCID 0000-0003-0553-6149

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurocognitive models of attentional bias for threat posit that attentional bias may result from a decreased activation of the left prefrontal cortex, and especially of its dorsolateral part (dlPFC), resulting in an impaired attention control. Consequently, a transient increase of neural activity within the left dlPFC via non-invasive brain stimulation reduces attentional bias among both anxious and nonanxious participants. Yet, it is still unclear whether the impact of dlPFC activation on attentional bias is mediated by improvement in attention control. In this experiment, we sought to test this hypothesis in an unselected sample (

Indexed as

attentional bias for threatattention controlneuromodulationprefrontal cortextranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID31328008
PMCPMC6625550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.