Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31327306›Full record

Trial reportJournal of psychoactive drugs

Heavy Drinking among Women Receiving Intensive Motivational Interviewing: 6-Month Outcomes.

Douglas L Polcin, Madhabika B Nayak, Rachael Korcha, Sheila Pugh, Jane Witbrodt, Michelle Salinardi, Gantt Galloway, Emily Nelson

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of psychoactive drugs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Gender and Childhood Victimization: A Longitudinal Study of Heavy Drinking in Young Adulthood.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Treatment Interventions for Women With Alcohol Use Disorder.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas L PolcinBehavioral Health and Recovery Studies, Public Health Institute, Lafayette, CA, USA.
Madhabika B NayakAlcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, CA, USA.
Rachael KorchaBehavioral Health and Recovery Studies, Public Health Institute, Lafayette, CA, USA.
Sheila PughBehavioral Health and Recovery Studies, Public Health Institute, Lafayette, CA, USA.
Jane WitbrodtAlcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, CA, USA.
Michelle SalinardiBehavioral Health and Recovery Studies, Public Health Institute, Lafayette, CA, USA.
Gantt GallowayFriends Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Emily NelsonBehavioral Health and Recovery Studies, Public Health Institute, Lafayette, CA, USA.
Public Health Institute · USFriends Research Institute · US

Funding

Randomized Trial of Intensive MI to Improve Drinking Outcomes Among WomenR01AA022857 · NIAAA · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI POLCIN, DOUGLAS L · 2014 to 2018
$3.2M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA022857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to men, women with alcohol use disorders experience more severe consequences related to drinking. Intensive Motivational Interviewing (IMI) is a new 9-session version of Motivational Interviewing (MI) designed for women with alcohol use disorders. The current study reports outcomes from a randomized clinical trial of IMI compared to a single session of MI. Data were collected at baseline, 2-month, and 6-month follow-up. In addition to a standard "intent-to-treat" (ITT) analysis, we conducted disaggregated subgroup analyses of women who were heavy drinkers and a "per protocol" (PP) analysis of women in the IMI condition who attended 7-9 sessions (80% of the IMI sample). Women in both study conditions made large reductions in drinking between baseline and 2 months that were maintained at 6 months. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models using the full sample (N = 215) did not show time by condition differences, but heavy drinkers(n = 153) receiving IMI showed significantly larger reductions in drinking at 2- and 6-month follow-up than the comparison condition. Assessment of heavy drinkers using the PP sample showed larger between condition differences favoring IMI at both follow-up time points. Results support the efficacy of IMI in terms of reducing drinking, particularly among women who are heavy drinkers.

Indexed as

Motivational InterviewingOutcome Assessment, Health CareAlcoholismFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansalcoholheavy drinkingintensive motivational interviewingmotivational interviewingWomen

Identifiers

PMID31327306
PMCPMC6823106
OpenAlexW2963273050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.