Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31327263›Full record

ArticleHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2019

Masked Uncontrolled Hypertension Is Not Attributable to Medication Nonadherence.

Mohammed Siddiqui, Eric K Judd, Tanja Dudenbostel, Bin Zhang, Pankaj Gupta, Maciej Tomaszewski, Prashanth Patel, Suzanne Oparil, David A Calhoun

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Twenty-Four-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.Journal of primary care & community health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohammed SiddiquiFrom the Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program (M.S., T.D., S.O., D.A.C.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Eric K JuddDivision of Nephrology (E.K.J.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Tanja DudenbostelFrom the Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program (M.S., T.D., S.O., D.A.C.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Bin ZhangDivision of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH (B.Z.).
Pankaj GuptaDepartment of Chemical Pathology and Metabolic Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, United Kingdom (P.G., P.P.).
Maciej TomaszewskiDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, United Kingdom (M.T.).
Prashanth PatelDepartment of Chemical Pathology and Metabolic Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, United Kingdom (P.G., P.P.).
Suzanne OparilFrom the Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program (M.S., T.D., S.O., D.A.C.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.
David A CalhounFrom the Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program (M.S., T.D., S.O., D.A.C.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Funding

MECHANISMS OF HYPERTENSION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASEST32HL007457 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Martin E Young · 1985 to 2026
$8.6M
Mechanisms of Refractory HypertensionR01HL113004 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI OPARIL, SUZANNE · 2014 to 2018
$2.5M
British Heart Foundation CS/17/3/32799NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113004NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) in treated hypertensive patients is defined as controlled automated office blood pressure (BP; <135/85 mm Hg) in-clinic but uncontrolled out-of-clinic BP by ambulatory BP monitoring (awake [daytime] readings ≥135/85 mm Hg or 24-hour readings ≥130/80 mm Hg). To determine whether MUCH is attributable to antihypertensive medication nonadherence. One hundred eighty-four enrolled patients were confirmed to have controlled office BP; of these, 167 patients were with adequate 24-hour ambulatory BP recordings. Of 167 patients, 86 were controlled by in-clinic BP assessment but had uncontrolled ambulatory awake BP, indicative of MUCH. The remaining 81 had controlled in-clinic and ambulatory awake BP, consistent with true controlled hypertension. After exclusion of 9 patients with missing 24-hour urine collections, antihypertensive medication adherence was determined based on the detection of urinary drugs or drug metabolites by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Of the 81 patients with MUCH, 69 (85.2%) were fully adherent and 12 (14.8%) were partially adherent (fewer medications detected than prescribed). Of the 77 patients with true controlled hypertension, 69 (89.6%) were fully adherent with prescribed antihypertensive medications and 8 (10.4%) were partially adherent. None of the patients in either group were fully nonadherent. There was no statistically significant difference in complete or partial adherence between the MUCH and true controlled groups (P=0.403). Measurement of urinary drug and drug metabolite levels demonstrates a similarly high level of antihypertensive medication adherence in both MUCH and truly controlled hypertensive patients. These findings indicate that MUCH is not attributable to antihypertensive medication nonadherence.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultAgedAge FactorsAmbulatory CareAntihypertensive AgentsBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitals, UniversityHumansMaleMasked HypertensionMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAntihypertensive Agentsblood pressurehumanshypertensionmedication adherence

Identifiers

PMID31327263
PMCPMC6687528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.