Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31327146›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2019

Interplay of Liver Disease and Gut Microbiota in the Development of Colorectal Neoplasia.

Michael W Gleeson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Hyperinsulinaemia in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael W GleesonDepartment of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA. Michael.Gleeson@VA.GOV.
Dartmouth College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewLiver disease, colon cancer, and the gut microbiome are intimately interrelated; however, the connections linking liver disease and colorectal neoplasia via the gut microbiota remain poorly understood and rarely addressed in a single space. The goal of this review is to take a broad perspective on the clinical problem of colorectal neoplasia in the liver disease population, recognize the significance of the clinical study findings, and delve into the evidence supporting putative molecular mechanisms connecting dysbiosis in the progression of liver disease to the development of colorectal neoplasia. RECENT

findingsClinical studies have recently reported increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with fatty liver disease, and risk increases with liver disease severity. Concurrently, the evolution of -omics technology has shown dysregulation of the gut microbial community, termed dysbiosis, in the progression of liver disease. Specific microbes enriched in the gut flora of liver disease patients have been linked to colon cancer and adenomatous precursor lesions. The gut microbiome of liver disease patients generates a pro-neoplastic environment, mediated via altered bile acid signaling and a dysregulated inflammatory response that suppresses immune surveillance. Research focused on the mechanisms linking liver disease to colorectal neoplasia via the gut microbiome is needed to help us prepare for the rising tide of colon cancer in young patients with an increasing prevalence of liver disease.

Indexed as

Bile acidsColorectal adenomaColorectal neoplasiaDysbiosisFatty liver diseaseGut microbiotaInflammationLiver disease

Identifiers

PMID31327146
OpenAlexW2963743108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.