ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2019
Environmental assessment of agricultural activities and groundwater nitrate pollution susceptibility: a regional case study (Southwestern Romania).
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nitrate and Nitrite in the Diet: Protective and Harmful Effects in Health and Disease.Current nutrition reports · 2025Review
- Nitrate in groundwater and agricultural products: intake and risk assessment in northeastern Iran.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Coupling loss characteristics of N-P-C through runoff and sediment in the hilly region of SE China under simulated rainfall.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffuse pollution of water resources from agricultural sources is a major environmental issue in Europe. The nutrients released in groundwater from cultivated fields and livestock production, together with pesticides, are the main source of concern in the framework of the European Nitrates Directive (91/676/EEC). Southern Romania continues to represent one of the most important cereal production areas of the country. The intensive exploitation during the communist period continues to have repercussions for the precarious quality of groundwater. The aim of our study was to establish the environmental conditions, quantify the agricultural activities at the local administrative unit level and afterwards, to highlight areas of susceptibility to nitrate pollution of groundwater within the Oltenia Plain. One of the most efficient methods to evaluate human influences by agricultural activities on groundwater is using different types of indicators, such as land use indicators (cultivated surfaces), animal husbandry indicators (livestock and great beef units), and agri-environmental indicators (use of fertilisers based on nitrogen and phosphorus, quantity/ha). Throughout the paper, GIS methods are used to determine the degree of influence on nitrate pollution of several eco-pedological indicators: soil types and subtypes, slope of the land, soil texture, soil permeability, and groundwater level. Statistics indicate that 85% of the study area is susceptible to nitrate pollution from agriculture. Indicators provide information that can be easily interpreted by decision and policy makers, and they facilitate the process of reducing nitrate pollution. This study shows that the correlation of statistics and GIS modelling is a useful method for guiding prevention practices for groundwater pollution at the regional scale in Southwestern Romania.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31327079What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.