Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31326995›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2020

Plaque burden can be assessed using intravascular optical coherence tomography and a dedicated automated processing algorithm: a comparison study with intravascular ultrasound.

Edouard Gerbaud, Giora Weisz, Atsushi Tanaka, Romain Luu, Hany Ahmed Salaheldin Hussein Osman, Grace Baldwin, Pierre Coste, Laurent Cognet, Sergio Waxman, Hui Zheng and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Outcomes of Patients With High-Risk Plaques Treated With a Bioresorbable Magnesium Scaffold: Insights From the BIOMAG-I Study.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Radial wall strain: a novel angiographic measure of plaque composition and vulnerability.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. The role of intracoronary imaging in translational research.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Edouard GerbaudWellman Center for Photomedicine, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, 40 Blossom Street, BHX-604A, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Giora WeiszColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Atsushi TanakaWellman Center for Photomedicine, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, 40 Blossom Street, BHX-604A, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Romain LuuWellman Center for Photomedicine, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, 40 Blossom Street, BHX-604A, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Hany Ahmed Salaheldin Hussein OsmanWellman Center for Photomedicine, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, 40 Blossom Street, BHX-604A, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Grace BaldwinWellman Center for Photomedicine, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, 40 Blossom Street, BHX-604A, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Pierre CosteCardiology Intensive Care Unit and Interventional Cardiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, 5 Avenue Magellan, Pessac 33600, France.
Laurent CognetInstitut d'Optique Graduate School, CNRS-UMR 5298, Bordeaux University, Rue François Miterrand, Talence 33400, France.
Sergio WaxmanDepartment of Cardiology, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA 01805, USA.
Hui ZhengBiostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeffrey W MosesColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Gary S MintzColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Takashi AkasakaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, Wakayama Prefecture 641-8509, Japan.
Akiko MaeharaColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Guillermo J TearneyWellman Center for Photomedicine, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, 40 Blossom Street, BHX-604A, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

Funding

Natural History of Vulnerable Coronary PlaquesR01HL076398 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BOUMA, BRETT E, TEARNEY, GUILLERMO J · 2004 to 2015
$7.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL076398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPlaque burden (PB) measurement using intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) is currently thought to be inferior to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We developed an automated IVOCT image processing algorithm to enhance the external elastic lamina (EEL) contour. Thus, we investigated the accuracies of standard IVOCT and an IVOCT enhancement algorithm for measuring PB using IVUS as the reference standard. METHODS AND

resultsThe EEL-enhancement algorithm combined adaptive attenuation compensation, exponentiation, angular registration, and image averaging using three sequential frames. In two different laboratories with intravascular imaging expertise, PB was quantified on 200 randomized, matched IVOCT and IVUS images by four independent observers. Fibroatheroma, fibrocalcific plaque, fibrous plaque, pathological intimal thickening (PIT), and mixed plaque were included in each set. Pearson's correlation coefficients between IVUS and standard IVOCT measurements of PB were 0.61, 0.67, 0.76, 0.78, and 0.87 for fibroatheromas, mixed plaques, fibrocalcific plaques, fibrous plaques, and PIT plaques, respectively. Pearson's correlation coefficients increased to 0.81, 0.83, 0.83, 0.84, and 0.90 when using the EEL-enhanced images (P = 0.003, P = 0.004, P = 0.08, P = 0.12, and P = 0.23, respectively). EEL-enhanced IVOCT analysis was associated with a lower EEL-area measurement absolute error for fibroatheromas, mixed plaques, and all pooled plaques (P = 0.006, P = 0.02, and P < 0.001, respectively). Compared with standard IVOCT, the EEL-enhanced IVOCT images had a higher sensitivity (79% vs. 28%, P < 0.001) and specificity (98% vs. 85%, P = 0.03) for plaques with an IVUS PB ≥70%.

conclusionEEL-enhanced IVOCT can be used to reliably measure PB in all types of coronary atherosclerotic lesions, including fibroatheromas and mixed plaques.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseasePlaque, AtheroscleroticAlgorithmsCoronary VesselsHumansPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsTomography, Optical CoherenceUltrasonography, Interventionalalgorithmintravascular ultrasoundoptical coherence tomographyplaque burden

Identifiers

PMID31326995
PMCPMC7237959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.