Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31326957›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2020

Waterpipe device cleaning practices and disposal of waste associated with waterpipe tobacco smoking in homes in the USA.

Nada Of Kassem, Noura O Kassem, Sandy Liles, Erin Reilly, Flora Kas-Petrus, Alexander Ivan B Posis, Melbourne F Hovell

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03253653 (Assessing Toxicity of Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking in Laboratory and Naturalistic Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03253653 nacompletednot on this map

Assessing Toxicity of Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking in Laboratory and Naturalistic Settings

TypeinterventionalSponsorSan Diego State UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled85ConditionsWaterpipe SmokingArmsDifferential effects of waterpipe smoking practices on toxicity of waterpipe tobacco smoke
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nada Of KassemSan Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego, California, USA nkassem@cbeachsdsu.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5403-7234
Noura O KassemSan Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego, California, USA.
Sandy LilesSan Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3240-7799
Erin ReillySan Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego, California, USA.
Flora Kas-PetrusSan Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego, California, USA.
Alexander Ivan B PosisSan Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego, California, USA.
Melbourne F HovellSan Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego, California, USA.
San Diego State University · US

Funding

Assessing Toxicity of Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking in Laboratory and Naturalistic SettingsR01DA042471 · NIDA · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KASSEM, NADA OSMAN · 2016 to 2018
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo quantify postsmoking waterpipe tobacco (WPT) waste and describe postsmoking waterpipe (WP) device cleaning practices and disposal of associated waste in home settings.

methodsWe analysed data from a US convenience sample of 50 exclusive WPT smokers, mean age 25.3 years. Data were collected at a home visit during which participants smoked one WPT head and completed a self-administered questionnaire on WP cleaning practices and disposal of waste associated with WPT use. Research assistants provided and prepared a WP for participants by weighing and loading 10 g of WPT in the WP head and placing 470 mL of water in the WP bowl. At the completion of the smoking session, research assistants measured the remaining WPT and water. Descriptive analyses were performed.

resultsOf the 10 g of fresh WPT used for each smoking session, 70.1% (mean=7.01 g) was discarded postsmoking as waste; for each 470 mL of water used in the WP bowl, 94.3% (mean=443 mL) was discarded. WP device cleaning practices ranged from never cleaning the device to cleaning it after each smoking session. Respondents reported discarding smoked WPT residue in the trash (81.6%) or the kitchen sink (14.3%) and discarding postsmoking charcoal in the trash (57.6%), the kitchen sink (27.3%) or backyard soil (9.1%). Respondents reported discarding smoked WP water in the kitchen sink (76.5%), bathroom sink (14.7%), toilet (2.9%) and backyard soil (5.9%).

conclusionsInterventions and regulations are needed to inform proper WP device cleaning practices and disposal of waste associated with WPT use. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03253653.

Indexed as

Smoking Water PipesWater Pipe SmokingAdultFemaleHumansMaleRefuse DisposalSmokersSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco, WaterpipeUnited StatesWaterYoung AdultWaterenvironmental wastehookahnargileshishawaterpipe tobacco

Identifiers

PMID31326957
PMCPMC6980180
OpenAlexW2964201210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.