Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31326777›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2019

Recent progress in the analysis of αβT cell and B cell receptor repertoires.

Mark M Davis, Scott D Boyd

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Inferring the T cell repertoire dynamics of healthy individuals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Antibody repertoire sequencing analysis.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. T cell antigen discovery.Nature methods · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark M DavisInstitute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA. Electronic address: mmdavis@stanford.edu.
Scott D BoydInstitute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; The Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Using a tonsil organoid system to probe conditions for the induction of protective antibody and T cell responses to influenza.U19AI057229 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Mark Morris Davis · 2003 to 2026
$88.5M
Tracking allergen specific T cells in multi-food allergyU19AI104209 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GALLI, STEPHEN JOSEPH · 2013 to 2025
$17.3M
Effects of aging on primary and secondary vaccine responses in a 15-year longitudinal cohortR01AI130398 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOYD, SCOTT DEXTER · 2017 to 2021
$4.0M
FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF PATHOGENIC AND PROTECTIVE PEANUT ALLERGEN-SPECIFIC HUMAN ANTIBODIESR01AI125567 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOYD, SCOTT DEXTER · 2017 to 2022
$2.6M
Storage and recall of human B cell memory of influenza over tissues and timeR01AI127877 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOYD, SCOTT DEXTER · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125567NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI127877NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130398NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI057229NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI104209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T cell receptors (TCRs) and B cell receptors (BCRs) are vertebrate evolution's best answer to the threat of microbial pathogens that can evolve much faster than ourselves. These antigen receptors are generated during T cell or B cell development by combinatorial rearrangement of germline genome V, D and J gene segments, and with junctional residues capable of enormous diversity. For decades the complexity of these receptor repertoires has limited their analysis, but advances in DNA sequencing technology and an array of complementary tools have now made their study much more tractable, filling a major gap in our ability to understand immunology as a system. Here, we summarize the recent approaches and discoveries that are enabling these advances, with some suggestions as to what may lie ahead.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAnimalsB-LymphocytesClonal Selection, Antigen-MediatedDisease SusceptibilityHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLymphocyte ActivationReceptors, Antigen, B-CellReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaT-LymphocytesReceptors, Antigen, B-CellReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta

Identifiers

PMID31326777
PMCPMC7075470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.