Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31326569›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Diffusion MRI microstructural models in the cervical spinal cord - Application, normative values, and correlations with histological analysis.

Kurt G Schilling, Samantha By, Haley R Feiler, Bailey A Box, Kristin P O'Grady, Atlee Witt, Bennett A Landman, Seth A Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Challenges for biophysical modeling of microstructure.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kurt G SchillingVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: kurt.g.schilling.1@vumc.org.
Samantha ByVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Haley R FeilerVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Bailey A BoxVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Kristin P O'GradyVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Atlee WittVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Bennett A LandmanVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Seth A SmithVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
Postdoctoral Training in Biomedical MRI and MRST32EB001628 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI John C Gore · 2003 to 2026
$7.0M
Controlling Quality and Capturing Uncertainty in Advanced Diffusion Weighted MRIR01EB017230 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A. · 2015 to 2024
$5.1M
Replacement and Upgrade of a 3T MR Scanner for ResearchS10OD021771 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GORE, JOHN C · 2016 to 2016
$2.0M
Structural and Functional MRI of the Cervical Spinal Cord in Multiple SclerosisR01NS109114 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SETH A · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Resting State FMRI as a Biomarker of Functional Integrity of Spinal CordR01NS104149 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GORE, JOHN C · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
Microstructural Characterization of the Optic Nerve in Optic NeuritisR01EY023240 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SETH A · 2014 to 2017
$1.0M
In Vivo Macromolecular and Protein-Based MRI in the Spinal Cord of MS PatientsR21NS087465 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, SETH A · 2014 to 2015
$431k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023240NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017230NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001628NIH HHS S10 OD021771NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104149NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109114NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS087465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-compartment tissue modeling using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging has proven valuable in the brain, offering novel indices sensitive to the tissue microstructural environment in vivo on clinical MRI scanners. However, application, characterization, and validation of these models in the spinal cord remain relatively under-studied. In this study, we apply a diffusion "signal" model (diffusion tensor imaging, DTI) and two commonly implemented "microstructural" models (neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging, NODDI; spherical mean technique, SMT) in the human cervical spinal cord of twenty-one healthy controls. We first provide normative values of DTI, SMT, and NODDI indices in a number of white matter ascending and descending pathways, as well as various gray matter regions. We then aim to validate the sensitivity and specificity of these diffusion-derived contrasts by relating these measures to indices of the tissue microenvironment provided by a histological template. We find that DTI indices are sensitive to a number of microstructural features, but lack specificity. The microstructural models also show sensitivity to a number of microstructure features; however, they do not capture the specific microstructural features explicitly modelled. Although often regarded as a simple extension of the brain in the central nervous system, it may be necessary to re-envision, or specifically adapt, diffusion microstructural models for application to the human spinal cord with clinically feasible acquisitions - specifically, adjusting, adapting, and re-validating the modeling as it relates to both theory (i.e. relevant biology, assumptions, and signal regimes) and parameter estimation (for example challenges of acquisition, artifacts, and processing).

Indexed as

Diffusion Tensor ImagingModels, AnatomicAdultCervical CordCorrelation of DataHumansDiffusion MRIMicrostructureMulti-compartment modelSignal modelSpinal cordValidation

Identifiers

PMID31326569
PMCPMC6765439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.