Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31325975›Full record

ArticleProgress in brain research2019

Electrical stimulation in a spiking neural network model of monkey superior colliculus.

A John van Opstal, Bahadir Kasap

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A John van OpstalDepartment of Biophysics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: j.vanopstal@donders.ru.nl.
Bahadir KasapDepartment of Biophysics, Radboud University, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The superior colliculus (SC) generates saccades by recruiting a population of cells in its topographically organized motor map. Supra-threshold electrical stimulation in the SC produces a normometric saccade with little effect of the stimulation parameters. Moreover, the kinematics of electrically evoked saccades strongly resemble natural, visual-evoked saccades. These findings support models in which the saccade vector is determined by a center-of-gravity computation of activated neurons, while trajectory and kinematics arise in brainstem-cerebellar feedback circuits. Recent single-unit recordings, however, have indicated that the SC population also specifies the instantaneous saccade kinematics, supporting an alternative model, in which the saccade trajectory results from dynamic summation of movement effects of all SC spike trains. Here we reconcile the linear summation model with stimulation results, by assuming that the electric field directly activates a relatively small set of neurons around the electrode tip, which subsequently sets up a large population response through lateral synaptic interactions.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaElectric StimulationElectrophysiological PhenomenaHaplorhiniNerve NetSaccadesSuperior ColliculiLateral synaptic interactionsLinear summationMotor mapPopulation codingSaccadesSpatial-temporal transformationVector averaging

Identifiers

PMID31325975
PMCPMC6744279
OpenAlexW2944644059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.