Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31325763›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2019

Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models.

Lakshmanan Sannachi, Mehrdad Gangeh, Hadi Tadayyon, Sonal Gandhi, Frances C Wright, Elzbieta Slodkowska, Belinda Curpen, Ali Sadeghi-Naini, William Tran, Gregory J Czarnota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lakshmanan SannachiPhysical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mehrdad GangehPhysical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hadi TadayyonPhysical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sonal GandhiMedical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Frances C WrightSurgical Oncology, Department of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Elzbieta SlodkowskaDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Belinda CurpenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ali Sadeghi-NainiDepartment of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
William TranPhysical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gregory J CzarnotaPhysical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: Gregory.Czarnota@sunnybrook.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to develop computational algorithms to best determine tumor responses early after the start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, based on quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and textural analysis in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

methodsA total of 100 LABC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in this study. Breast tumors were scanned with a clinical ultrasound system prior to treatment, during the first, fourth and eighth weeks of treatment, and prior to surgery. QUS parameters were calculated from ultrasound radio frequency data within tumor regions. Texture features were extracted from each QUS parametric map. Patients were classified into two groups based on identified clinical/pathological response: responders and non-responders. In order to differentiate treatment responders, three multi-feature response classification algorithms, namely a linear discriminant, a k-nearest-neighbor and a nonlinear support vector machine classifier were compared.

resultsAll algorithms distinguished responders and non-responders with accuracies ranging between 68% and 92%. In particular, support vector machine performed the best in differentiating responders from non-responders with accuracies of 78%, 90% and 92% at weeks 1, 4 and 8 after the start of treatment, respectively. The most relevant features in separating the two response groups at early stages (weeks 1and 4) were texture features and at a later stage (week 8) were mean QUS parameters, particularly ultrasound backscatter intensity-based parameters.

conclusionAn early stage treatment response prediction model developed by quantitative ultrasound and texture analysis combined with modern computational methods permits offering effective alternatives to standard treatment for refractory patients.

Identifiers

PMID31325763
PMCPMC6639683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.