Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31325405›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2020

Biotechnological mechanism for improving plant remobilization of phosphorus during leaf senescence.

Letitia M Da Ros, Shawn D Mansfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Letitia M Da RosDepartment of Wood Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Shawn D MansfieldDepartment of Wood Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0175-554X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphorus enrichment of aquatic ecosystems through diffuse source pollution is an ongoing issue worldwide. A potential solution lies in the use of fast-growing, multipurpose feedstocks, such as trees, to limit the flow of phosphorus into riparian areas through luxury consumption. However, the perennial nature of trees and their use of leaves as storage organs for excess phosphorus may reduce the effectiveness of contaminant removal during periods of leaf abscission. In an attempt to improve phosphorus remobilization during autumnal senescence, transgenic hybrid poplar P39 (Populus alba × Populus grandidentata) and Arabidopsis thaliana harbouring a constitutively expressed low-affinity potato phosphate transporter (35S::StPht1-1) were generated using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. For both species, the highest expressing 35S::StPht1-1 lines were grown alongside wild-type plants and subjected to increasing phosphate applications. StPht1-1 expression in A. thaliana led to a reduction in biomass when grown under high-phosphate conditions and had no effect on phosphate remobilization during senescence. In contrast, StPht1-1 constitutive expression in P39 resulted in increased leaf phosphate content in the highest expressing transgenic line and minimal to no effect on P resorption efficiency. Surprisingly, sulphate resorption showed the greatest improvement in all three transgenic poplar lines, displaying a 31%-37% increase in resorption efficiency. These results highlight the complexity of nutrient resorption mechanisms in plants.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisPhosphorusPlant LeavesPopulusBiotechnologyEcosystemPlants, Genetically ModifiedPhosphorusArabidopsishybrid poplarnutrient resorptionnutrient uptakephosphorusPHT1 familyphytoremediationsenescence

Identifiers

PMID31325405
PMCPMC6953190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.