Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31325379›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2019

Effect of divergence in residual feed intake on expression of lipid metabolism-related genes in the liver of meat-type ducks1.

Sihua Jin, Lei Yang, Xinfeng Fan, Minghui Wu, Yuan Xu, Xianzen Chen, Zhiqiang Lin, Zhaoyu Geng

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The DuckAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Protective effects and mechanisms of Lizhong decoction against non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a rat model.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sihua JinCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Lei YangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Xinfeng FanCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Minghui WuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Yuan XuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Xianzen ChenAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Local Animal Genetic Resources Conservation and Biobreeding, Hefei, China.
Zhiqiang LinHuangshan Qiangying Duck Breeding Co. Ltd., Huangshan, China.
Zhaoyu GengCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Anhui Agricultural University · CNHuangshan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipid metabolism is considered one of the important factors affecting residual feed intake (RFI). However, the relationship between RFI and expression of lipid metabolism-related genes is unknown in meat-type ducks. To address this issue, a total of 1,000 male meat-type ducks with similar body weight were randomly selected to measure body weight gain and feed intake from 21 to 42 d of age to estimate RFI. The 8 greatest- (high RFI [HRFI]) and lowest- (low RFI [LRFI]) ranking birds were then selected for the present study. Relative expressions of key genes, namely sirtuin 1 (Sirt1), forkhead box O1 (Foxo1), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), sterol regulatory element-binding transcription factor 1c (SREBP-1c), fas cell surface death receptor (FAS), acetyl-CoA carboxylase alpha (ACC), carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A (CPT1A), and acyl-CoA oxidase 1 (ACOX1), were then determined in the HRFI and LRFI ducks by quantitative PCR. The results showed that RFI, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and average daily feed intake (ADFI) were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in LRFI ducks than in HRFI ducks. In addition, expression of Sirt1, Foxo1, CPT1A, and ACOX1 were significantly higher in LRFI ducks than in HRFI ducks (P < 0.05), whereas PPARγ and FAS expression levels were significantly lower in LRFI ducks than in HRFI ducks (P < 0.01). Correlation analysis showed that Sirt1, CPT1A, and ACOX1 expressions were significantly negatively correlated with FCR (r = -0.81 to -0.93; P < 0.01), whereas PPARγ and FAS expressions were significantly positively correlated with FCR (r = 0.74 to 0.87; P < 0.01). PPARγ expression was significantly positively correlated with RFI (r = 0.83; P < 0.01), whereas CPT1A and ACOX1 expressions were significantly negatively correlated with RFI (r = -0.84 to -0.89; P < 0.01). Sirt1 mRNA expression was positively correlated with Foxo1, CPT1A, and ACOX1 mRNA expression (r = 0.78 to 0.92; P < 0.01). Association of Foxo1 with CPT1A and ACOX1 was positive (r = 0.88 to 0.96; P < 0.01). These results suggest that genes related to fatty acid oxidation are upregulated in the liver of ducks with high feed efficiency, while genes associated with lipid synthesis are downregulated. Furthermore, the inclusion of lipid metabolism-related genes in future breeding programs might be beneficial for selecting ducks with greater feed efficiency phenotype.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsBody WeightBreedingDucksEatingFatty AcidsGene Expression RegulationGenetic MarkersLipid MetabolismLiverMaleOxidation-ReductionPhenotypeRed MeatFatty AcidsGenetic Markersassociationgene expressionlipid metabolismmeat-type ducksresidual feed intake

Identifiers

PMID31325379
PMCPMC6735845
OpenAlexW2963869454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.