ReviewPhysiological reports2019
An appraisal of the SD
Review in Physiological reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Standard Deviation of Individual Response for VOSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Pooled it
- Interindividual Differences in Trainability and Moderators of Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Waist Circumference, and Body Mass Responses: A Large-Scale Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Interindividual variability in response to protein and fish oil supplementation in older adults: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2022Trial
- Estimating heterogeneity of physical function treatment response to caloric restriction among older adults with obesity.PloS one · 2022Trial
- Reproducibility of Acute Changes in Range of Motion Following Short-Term Static Stretching of the Hamstrings and Gastrocnemius.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- How Much Is Enough: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial Comparing Three Bodyweight Training Protocols.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- Inter-Individual Heterogeneity in Aerobic Training Adaptations: Systematic Review of the Evidence Base for Personalized Exercise Prescription.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Do Surrogate Markers of Cardiorespiratory Fitness Predict Individual Changes in VOInternational journal of exercise science · 2024Article
- Does Higher Intensity Increase the Rate of Responders to Endurance Training When Total Energy Expenditure Remains Constant? A Randomized Controlled Trial.Sports medicine - open · 2023Article
- Article
- A Systematic Review Examining the Approaches Used to Estimate Interindividual Differences in Trainability and Classify Individual Responses to Exercise Training.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- Causes and Consequences of Interindividual Response Variability: A Call to Apply a More Rigorous Research Design in Acute Exercise-Cognition Studies.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Hyperglycaemia is associated with impaired muscle signalling and aerobic adaptation to exercise.Nature metabolism · 2020Article
- An appraisal of the SDPhysiological reports · 2019Review
- Dose-Response Matters! - A Perspective on the Exercise Prescription in Exercise-Cognition Research.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Calculating the standard deviation of individual responses (SD
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.