Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31325152›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2019

Report of phase I and II trials of melphalan, prednisolone, and thalidomide triplet combination therapy versus melphalan and prednisolone doublet combination therapy in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation.

Kenshi Suzuki, Noriko Doki, Kuniaki Meguro, Kazutaka Sunami, Hiroshi Kosugi, Osamu Sasaki, Toshiyuki Takagi, Hirokazu Murakami, Kazuyuki Shimizu

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Kenshi SuzukiDepartment of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, 4-1-22, Hiroo, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 150-8935, Japan. ken-suzuki@mtb.biglobe.ne.jp.
Noriko DokiDepartment of Hematology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22, Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kuniaki MeguroDepartment of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, 2-8-8, Miyagino, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Kazutaka SunamiDepartment of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center, 1711-1 Tamasu, Kita-ku, Okayama, Okayama, Japan.
Hiroshi KosugiDepartment of Hematology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, 4-86, Minaminokawa-cho, Ogaki, Gifu, Japan.
Osamu SasakiDepartment of Hematology, Miyagi Cancer Center, 47-1, Nodayama, Medeshima-shiote, Natori, Miyagi, Japan.
Toshiyuki TakagiDepartment of Hematology, Oami Municipal Hospital, 884-1 Tomita, Oami-shirasato, Chiba, Japan.
Hirokazu MurakamiDepartment of Laboratory Sciences, Gunma University Graduate School of Health Sciences, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Kazuyuki ShimizuDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, National Hospital Organization Higashi Nagoya National Hospital, 5-101, Umemorizaka, Meito-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Gunma University · JPHigashi Nagoya National Hospital · JPItami City Hospital · JPJapanese Red Cross Medical Center · JPMiyagi Prefectural Hospital Organization · JPNational Hospital Organization · JPOgaki Municipal Hospital · JPOkayama Medical Center · JPTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a phase I study to determine the recommended dose of thalidomide combined with melphalan plus prednisolone (MPT) and a phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of this MPT regimen in transplant-ineligible Japanese patients with untreated multiple myeloma. The recommended dose was determined to be 100 mg/day in the phase I study. In the phase II, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients were allocated to either MPT (n = 52) or MP (n = 51), with 21 and 29 patients completing the study, respectively. Overall response rate, the primary endpoint, was significantly higher in the MPT [40.4% (21/52 patients), 95% confidence interval (CI) 27.0-54.9%] than in the MP [19.6% (10/51 patients), 95% CI 9.8-33.1%] group (P = 0.022). Time to response was also significantly shorter in the MPT group. Incidences of hematological toxicities were similar in the two groups, suggesting that addition of thalidomide did not increase hematological toxicity. Although incidences of some non-hematological toxicities tended to be higher in the MPT group, the low incidence of ≥ Grade 3 toxicities suggests that MPT therapy was well tolerated. These results support the safety and efficacy of MPT therapy in untreated Japanese multiple myeloma patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAsian PeopleAutograftsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMelphalanMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaPrednisoloneStem Cell TransplantationThalidomideTreatment OutcomeMelphalanPrednisoloneThalidomideFrontline therapyJapanese patientsMPTNewly diagnosed multiple myelomaTransplant ineligible

Identifiers

PMID31325152
OpenAlexW2964224107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.