Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31325043›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2020

Residual inflammatory risk in coronary heart disease: incidence of elevated high-sensitive CRP in a real-world cohort.

Alexander Peikert, Klaus Kaier, Julian Merz, Lucas Manhart, Ibrahim Schäfer, Ingo Hilgendorf, Philipp Hehn, Dennis Wolf, Florian Willecke, Xia Sheng and 6 more

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexander PeikertDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Klaus KaierInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Julian MerzDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Lucas ManhartDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Ibrahim SchäferDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Ingo HilgendorfDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Philipp HehnInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Dennis WolfDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Florian WilleckeDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Xia ShengDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Andreas ClemensDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Manfred ZehenderDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Constantin von Zur MühlenDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Christoph BodeDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Andreas ZirlikDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. andreas.zirlik@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6290-3297
Peter StachonDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DEMedical University of Graz · ATNovartis (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammation drives atherosclerosis and its complications. Anti-inflammatory therapy with interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) antibody reduces cardiovascular events in patients with elevated high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP). This study aims to identify the share of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and residual inflammation who may benefit from anti-inflammatory therapy.

methodshsCRP and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels were determined in 2741 all-comers admitted to the cardiological ward of our tertiary referral hospital between June 2016 and June 2018. Patients without CHD, with acute coronary syndrome, chronic or recurrent systemic infection, use of immunosuppressant or anti-inflammatory agents, chronic inflammatory diseases, chemotherapy, terminal organ failure, traumatic injury and pregnancy were excluded.

results856 patients with stable CHD were included. 42.7% of those had elevated hsCRP ≥ 2 mg/l. Within the group of patients with LDL-cholesterol < 70 mg/dl, 30.9% shared increased hsCRP indicating residual inflammation. After multivariate adjusted backward selection elevated Lipoprotein (a) (OR 1.61, p = 0.048), elevated proBNP (OR 2.57, p < 0.0001), smoking (OR 1.70, p = 0.022), and obesity (OR 2.28, p = 0.007) were associated with elevated hsCRP. In contrast, the use of ezetimibe was associated with normal hsCRP (OR 0.51, p = 0.014). In the subgroup of patients with on-target LDL-cholesterol < 70 mg/dl, backward selection identified elevated proBNP (OR 3.49, p = 0.007) as independent predictor of elevated hsCRP in patients with LDL-cholesterol < 70 mg/dl.

conclusionOne-third of all-comers patients with CHD showed increased levels of hsCRP despite a LDL-cholesterol < 70 mg/dl potentially qualifying for an anti-inflammatory therapy. Elevated proBNP is an independent risk factor for hsCRP elevation.

Indexed as

AgedAnticholesteremic AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAtherosclerosisCholesterol, LDLCohort StudiesCoronary DiseaseC-Reactive ProteinCross-Sectional StudiesEzetimibeFemaleHumansIncidenceInflammationMaleNatriuretic Peptide, BrainAnticholesteremic AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCholesterol, LDLC-Reactive ProteinEzetimibeNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)Cardiovascular diseaseCoronary heart diseasehsCRPInflammationLDL-cholesterolReal-world cohort

Identifiers

PMID31325043
PMCPMC7042185
OpenAlexW2963321413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.