Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31324979›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2019

Moderate versus extreme hypofractionated radiotherapy: a toxicity comparative analysis in low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.

Luca Nicosia, Rosario Mazzola, Michele Rigo, Vanessa Figlia, Niccolò Giaj-Levra, Giuseppe Napoli, Francesco Ricchetti, Stefanie Corradini, Ruggero Ruggieri, Filippo Alongi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. PSA reduction as predictor of biochemical relapse in low and favourable intermediate prostate cancer treated with radical radiotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Radiotherapy-related toxicity for localized prostate cancer: meta-analysis comparing conventional or moderately hypofractionated vs. ultrahypofractionated protocols.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Linac-based SBRT as a feasible salvage option for local recurrences in previously irradiated prostate cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luca NicosiaAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy. lucanicosia.rg@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0731-8041
Rosario MazzolaAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy.
Michele RigoAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy.
Vanessa FigliaAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy.
Niccolò Giaj-LevraAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy.
Giuseppe NapoliAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy.
Francesco RicchettiAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy.
Stefanie CorradiniRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ruggero RuggieriAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy.
Filippo AlongiAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExternal beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is an effective treatment option for low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) and it is usually delivered in conventional fractionation or with moderate hypofractionation (hRT), with comparable results. In the last years, a new treatment approach with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has shown promising results. The aim of the present study was to directly compare the toxicity and outcome between hRT and SBRT in low and favorable intermediate PCa patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe hRT schedules were: 71.4 Gy or 74.2 Gy in 28 fractions for low- or favorable intermediate-risk PCa, respectively, while the SBRT schedules were: 35 Gy or 37.5 Gy in five fractions, for low or favorable intermediate risk, respectively. Toxicity assessment was performed according to CTCAE v5.0 grading. The International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) was also recorded.

resultsOne hundred forty-nine patients were analyzed, overall 81 (54.36%) patients were low risk and 68 (45.64%) were favorable intermediate risk. Sixty-nine (46.3%) patients were treated with hypo-RT and 80 (53.7%) with SBRT. Median follow-up was 33 months (range 11-58 months). The actuarial survival rate was 98.66%. The 3-years BFS rates were 95.5% and 100% for hRT and SBRT, respectively (p = 0.051). One case (0.6%) of acute grade 3 urinary toxicity occurred in a patient with favorable intermediate risk treated with hRT. He initially suffered gross hematuria and acute urinary retention not treatable with urinary catheter, therefore a suprapubic catheter was placed and steroids were administered. No differences in acute, late or severe toxicity were detected.

conclusionStereotactic body radiotherapy reported a good clinical outcome and safe toxicity profile. Results are comparable to hRT, but a longer follow-up is needed to assess the late effectiveness and toxicity.

Indexed as

Radiation Dose HypofractionationRadiosurgeryAgedAged, 80 and overClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedProstate-Specific AntigenFavorable intermediate riskHypofractionated radiotherapyLow riskProstate cancerSBRTStereotactic body radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31324979
PMCPMC11810164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.