Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31324936›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2019

Computational modelling reveals contrasting effects on reinforcement learning and cognitive flexibility in stimulant use disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder: remediating effects of dopaminergic D2/3 receptor agents.

Jonathan W Kanen, Karen D Ersche, Naomi A Fineberg, Trevor W Robbins, Rudolf N Cardinal

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Chronic escitalopram in healthy volunteers has specific effects on reinforcement sensitivity: a double-blind, placebo-controlled semi-randomised study.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan W KanenDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. jonathan.kanen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4095-5405
Karen D ErscheBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Naomi A FinebergDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Trevor W RobbinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Rudolf N CardinalBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17213Medical Research Council MR/M009041/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDisorders of compulsivity such as stimulant use disorder (SUD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are characterised by deficits in behavioural flexibility, some of which have been captured using probabilistic reversal learning (PRL) paradigms.

objectivesThis study used computational modelling to characterise the reinforcement learning processes underlying patterns of PRL behaviour observed in SUD and OCD and to show how the dopamine D

methodsWe applied a hierarchical Bayesian method to PRL data across three groups: individuals with SUD, OCD, and healthy controls. Participants completed three sessions where they received placebo, pramipexole, and amisulpride, in a double-blind placebo-controlled, randomised design. We compared seven models using a bridge sampling estimate of the marginal likelihood.

resultsStimulus-bound perseveration, a measure of the degree to which participants responded to the same stimulus as before irrespective of outcome, was significantly increased in SUD, but decreased in OCD, compared to controls (on placebo). Individuals with SUD also exhibited reduced reward-driven learning, whilst both the SUD and OCD groups showed increased learning from punishment (nonreward). Pramipexole and amisulpride had similar effects on the control and OCD groups; both increased punishment-driven learning. These D

conclusionsWe provide a parsimonious computational account of how perseverative tendencies and reward- and punishment-driven learning differentially contribute to PRL in SUD and OCD. D

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAdultCentral Nervous System StimulantsCognitionDopamine AgonistsDopamine AntagonistsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, NeurologicalObsessive-Compulsive DisorderReceptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Dopamine D3Central Nervous System StimulantsDopamine AgonistsDopamine AntagonistsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Dopamine D3AddictionAmisulprideCompulsivityComputational modellingDopamineObsessive-compulsive disorderPramipexoleReinforcement learningReversal learningStimulant use disorder

Identifiers

PMID31324936
PMCPMC6820481
OpenAlexW2957704534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.