ReviewDer Anaesthesist2019
[Anesthesiological management in endovascular stroke treatment].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application Analysis of Multidisciplinary Diagnosis and Treatment Nursing Mode Based on Doctor-Nurse-Integration for Stroke Patients Undergoing Emergency Intervention Surgery.Emergency medicine international · 2022Article
- Team Prenotification Reduces Procedure Times for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Large Vessel Occlusion Who Are Transferred for Endovascular Therapy.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- [Perioperative stroke].Der Anaesthesist · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early recanalization of the closed cerebral arteries after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the only treatment to minimize long-term disability and to reduce the associated morbidity and mortality. For a long time the only proven causal treatment of AIS was intravenous thrombolysis; however, after the publication of a series of randomized prospective studies concerning endovascular mechanical thrombectomy using stent retriever systems after AIS, new guidelines were published. It was found that endovascular treatment (EVT) dramatically improves the outcome of eligible patients. The stent retriever enables high recanalization rates by clot removal from the cerebral arterial system by means of aspiration of the thrombus via the catheter and/or by entrapping it with a stent system. The management of anesthesia during the procedure is indispensable to prevent hypoxia and hemodynamic instability; however, which form of anesthesia (i.e. general anesthesia vs. conscious sedation) is advantageous for the patient during EVT is controversially discussed. In the first studies using retrospective data conscious sedation resulted in a better outcome compared to general anesthesia following EVT; however, in prospective studies this finding could not be confirmed. To obtain optimal neurological results after AIS and EVT with general anesthesia, it is of tremendous importance not to delay the EVT due to the anesthesiology procedure. Furthermore, hypotension, hypovolemia and hypocapnia should also be strictly avoided. Finally, the optimal anesthesiological approach should be guided by the current clinical state and pre-existing comorbidities of the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.