Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31324802›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Estimating dispensable content in the human interactome.

Mohamed Ghadie, Yu Xia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mutation Edgotype Drives Fitness Effect in Human.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Precision medicine - networks to the rescue.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohamed GhadieDepartment of Bioengineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8300-7360
Yu XiaDepartment of Bioengineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. brandon.xia@mcgill.ca.
McGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks (interactome networks) have successfully advanced our knowledge of molecular function, disease and evolution. While much progress has been made in quantifying errors and biases in experimental PPI datasets, it remains unknown what fraction of the error-free PPIs in the cell are completely dispensable, i.e., effectively neutral upon disruption. Here, we estimate dispensable content in the human interactome by calculating the fractions of PPIs disrupted by neutral and non-neutral mutations. Starting with the human reference interactome determined by experiments, we construct a human structural interactome by building homology-based three-dimensional structural models for PPIs. Next, we map common mutations from healthy individuals as well as Mendelian disease-causing mutations onto the human structural interactome, and perform structure-based calculations of how these mutations perturb the interactome. Using our predicted as well as experimentally-determined interactome perturbation patterns by common and disease mutations, we estimate that <~20% of the human interactome is completely dispensable.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein Interaction MapsCarrier ProteinsComputational BiologyDiseaseGene Expression RegulationGene OntologyHumansModels, MolecularMutationProtein Interaction MappingProteinsCarrier ProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID31324802
PMCPMC6642175
OpenAlexW2964314049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.