Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31324649›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of cell biology2019

Assembling nuclear domains: Lessons from DNA repair.

Benjamin Schrank, Jean Gautier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of cell biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Recent advances in nuclear actin research.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Envisioning a role for nuclear actin in prophase I spermatocytes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Multi-scale dynamics of heterochromatin repair.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin SchrankInstitute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
Jean GautierInstitute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY jg130@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6348-6023

Funding

The Role of CTIP in Lymphocyte Development and LymphomagenesisP01CA174653 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GAUTIER, JEAN · 2014 to 2024
$17.6M
DNA Repair and Genomic Instability in Cancer Development and TherapyR35CA197606 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GAUTIER, JEAN · 2015 to 2021
$5.7M
Role of Nuclear Actin Polymerization in Double-Strand Break Mobility and RepairF30CA217049 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SCHRANK, BENJAMIN R · 2018 to 2020
$131k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA217049NCI NIH HHS P01 CA174653NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic nuclei are organized into nuclear domains that unite loci sharing a common function. These domains are essential for diverse processes including (1) the formation of topologically associated domains (TADs) that coordinate replication and transcription, (2) the formation of specialized transcription and splicing factories, and (3) the clustering of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), which concentrates damaged DNA for repair. The generation of nuclear domains requires forces that are beginning to be identified. In the case of DNA DSBs, DNA movement and clustering are driven by actin filament nucleators. Furthermore, RNAs and low-complexity protein domains such as RNA-binding proteins also accumulate around sites of transcription and repair. The link between liquid-liquid phase separation and actin nucleation in the formation of nuclear domains is still unknown. This review discusses DSB repair domain formation as a model for functional nuclear domains in other genomic contexts.

Indexed as

DNA RepairAnimalsCell NucleusChromosomesCytoskeletonDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedGenomeHumans

Identifiers

PMID31324649
PMCPMC6683749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.