Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31324518›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2019

Kissing, saliva exchange, and transmission of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Edward W Hook, Kyle Bernstein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis in Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM) in The Netherlands: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Visual and Rapid Diagnosis ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Impact of the gonococcal FC428Emerging microbes & infections · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Edward W HookDepartments of Medicine, Epidemiology, and Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Electronic address: ehook@uab.edu.
Kyle BernsteinCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of STD Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data from mathematical models suggest that kissing and saliva exchange during sexual activity might be major contributors to community gonorrhoea morbidity. Although there is little evidence to support this, it provokes discussion of the potential role of the oropharynx in gonorrhoea control. Improved sensitivity and ease of diagnostic testing, as well as increased screening for extragenital infections among men who have sex with men, have increased awareness of the high frequency of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea. However, there are insufficient data to determine the mechanisms of transmission for these infections. Innovative studies that use quantitative microbiological techniques are needed to accurately assess how oral gonorrhoea or saliva exchange in infected people contribute to the morbidity of gonorrhoea in the community. More empirical data on pharyngeal gonorrhoea infections, and the role of transmission to and from the oropharynx, are needed to inform prevention planning.

Indexed as

Homosexuality, MaleFemaleGonorrheaHumansMaleModels, BiologicalNeisseria gonorrhoeaeOropharynxPharyngitisPrevalenceRiskSalivaSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexual Partners

Identifiers

PMID31324518
PMCPMC6764880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.