ArticleSeminars in arthritis and rheumatism2020
Disease progression in relation to pre-onset parity among women with rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRheumatoid arthritis (RA) often ameliorates during pregnancy and flares postpartum, but the relationship of pregnancy and childbirth to RA prognosis is unclear. We examined RA severity for association with parity prior to RA onset and asked whether time from birth (latency) and/or the mother's HLA genotype influenced results.
methodsA cohort study was conducted of 222 women previously identified in a prospective study of newly diagnosed RA, who returned for follow-up evaluation a median of 8 years later. Stratified analyses using Mantel-Haenszel methods were conducted to evaluate 5 RA severity measures based on hand and wrist radiographs, physical exams, and Health Assessment Questionnaires for association with parity.
resultsOverall, we observed little evidence of altered risk of progression to severe RA in relation to pre-onset parity, adjusting for RA onset age and time to follow-up. Stratifying parous women who had only live births by latency (<15 years/15+ years) showed no difference in risk of severe RA compared to nulligravid women. Live birth deliveries were significantly protective for women with 0 but not for those with 1 or 2 copies of the RA risk-associated HLA-DRB1 shared epitope sequence for erosion score (RR 0.26 95% CI 0.09-0.89) and joint count (RR 0.28 95% CI 0.09-0.87).
conclusionWe observed little evidence of difference in severe RA by pre-onset parity overall. However, among women not predisposed to RA by possessing the risk-associated HLA genotype, parous women who had only live births had lower risk of progression to severe RA as measured by erosion score and joint count.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.