Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31324260›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2019

Towards a unified protocol for handling of CSF before β-amyloid measurements.

Shorena Janelidze, Erik Stomrud, Britta Brix, Oskar Hansson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: a field-test in a memory clinic.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. State-of-the-art of lumbar puncture and its place in the journey of patients with Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2022
    Review
  19. Knowledge gaps in Alzheimer's disease immune biomarker research.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shorena JanelidzeDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Sölvegatan 19, BMC B11, 221 84, Lund, Sweden. shorena.janelidze@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0003-2869-8378
Erik StomrudDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Sölvegatan 19, BMC B11, 221 84, Lund, Sweden.
Britta BrixEUROIMMUN AG, 23560, Luebeck, Germany.
Oskar HanssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Sölvegatan 19, BMC B11, 221 84, Lund, Sweden. Oskar.Hansson@med.lu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWidespread implementation of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in routine clinical practice requires the establishment of standard operating procedures for pre-analytical handling of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).

methodsHere, CSF collection and storage protocols were optimized for measurements of β-amyloid (Aβ). We investigated the effects of (1) storage temperature, (2) storage time, (3) centrifugation, (4) sample mixing, (5) blood contamination, and (6) collection gradient on CSF levels of Aβ. For each study participant, we used fresh CSF directly collected into a protein low binding (LoB) tube that was analyzed within hours after lumbar puncture (LP) as standard of truth. Aβ42 and Aβ40 were measured in de-identified CSF samples using EUROIMMUN and Mesoscale discovery assays.

resultsCSF Aβ42 and Aβ40 were stable for at least 72 h at room temperature (RT), 1 week at 4 °C, and 2 weeks at - 20 °C and - 80 °C. Centrifugation of non-blood-contaminated CSF or mixing of samples before the analysis did not affect Aβ levels. Addition of 0.1-10% blood to CSF that was stored at RT without centrifugation led to a dose- and time-dependent decrease in Aβ42 and Aβ40, while Aβ42/Aβ40 did not change. The effects of blood contamination were mitigated by centrifugation and/or storage at 4 °C or - 20 °C. Aβ levels did not differ between the first to fourth 5-ml portions of CSF.

conclusionsCSF can be stored for up to 72 h at RT, 1 week at 4 °C, or at least 2 weeks at either - 20 °C or - 80 °C before Aβ measurements. Centrifugation of fresh non-blood-contaminated CSF after LP, or mixing before analysis, is not required. In case of visible blood contamination, centrifugation and storage at 4 °C or - 20 °C is recommended. After discarding the first 2 ml, any portion of up to 20 ml of CSF is suitable for Aβ analysis. These findings will be important for the development of a clinical routine protocol for pre-analytical handling of CSF.

Indexed as

Specimen HandlingAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersHumansPeptide FragmentsAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-40)amyloid beta-protein (1-42)BiomarkersPeptide FragmentsAlzheimer’s disease diagnosisBiomarkersCerebrospinal fluidPre-analytical variablesβ-Amyloid

Identifiers

PMID31324260
PMCPMC6642586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.