Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31324192›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2019

Salaried and voluntary community health workers: exploring how incentives and expectation gaps influence motivation.

Hermen Ormel, Maryse Kok, Sumit Kane, Rukhsana Ahmed, Kingsley Chikaphupha, Sabina Faiz Rashid, Daniel Gemechu, Lilian Otiso, Mohsin Sidat, Sally Theobald and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
29.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 187 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Hermen OrmelRoyal Tropical Institute, KIT Health, P.O. Box 95001, 1090 HA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.ormel@kit.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1521-9462
Maryse KokRoyal Tropical Institute, KIT Health, P.O. Box 95001, 1090 HA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sumit KaneRoyal Tropical Institute, KIT Health, P.O. Box 95001, 1090 HA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rukhsana AhmedEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jalan Diponegoro 69, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia.
Kingsley ChikaphuphaResearch for Equity and Community Health (REACH) Trust, P.O. Box 1597, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Sabina Faiz RashidBRAC James P. Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Daniel GemechuHHA-YAM, P.O. Box 303, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Lilian OtisoLVCT Health, Research and Strategic Information Department, P.O. Box 19835-00202, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mohsin SidatDepartment of Community Health, University Eduardo Mondlane, P.O. Box 257, Maputo, Mozambique.
Sally TheobaldDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Miriam TaegtmeyerDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Korrie de KoningRoyal Tropical Institute, KIT Health, P.O. Box 95001, 1090 HA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Royal Tropical Institute · NLLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBBRAC University · BDEduardo Mondlane University · MZEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology · IDLVCT Health · KEResearch for Equity And Community Health Trust · MW

Funding

European Union FP7 306090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe recent publication of the WHO guideline on support to optimise community health worker (CHW) programmes illustrates the renewed attention for the need to strengthen the performance of CHWs. Performance partly depends on motivation, which in turn is influenced by incentives. This paper aims to critically analyse the use of incentives and their link with improving CHW motivation.

methodsWe undertook a comparative analysis on the linkages between incentives and motivation based on existing datasets of qualitative studies in six countries. These studies had used a conceptual framework on factors influencing CHW performance, where motivational factors were defined as financial, material, non-material and intrinsic and had undertaken semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with CHWs, supervisors, health managers and selected community members.

resultsWe found that (a mix of) incentives influence motivation in a similar and sometimes different way across contexts. The mode of CHW engagement (employed vs. volunteering) influenced how various forms of incentives affect each other as well as motivation. Motivation was negatively influenced by incentive-related "expectation gaps", including lower than expected financial incentives, later than expected payments, fewer than expected material incentives and job enablers, and unequally distributed incentives across groups of CHWs. Furthermore, we found that incentives could cause friction for the interface role of CHWs between communities and the health sector.

conclusionsWhether CHWs are employed or engaged as volunteers has implications for the way incentives influence motivation. Intrinsic motivational factors are important to and experienced by both types of CHWs, yet for many salaried CHWs, they do not compensate for the demotivation derived from the perceived low level of financial reward. Overall, introducing and/or sustaining a form of financial incentive seems key towards strengthening CHW motivation. Adequate expectation management regarding financial and material incentives is essential to prevent frustration about expectation gaps or "broken promises", which negatively affect motivation. Consistently receiving the type and amount of incentives promised appears as important to sustain motivation as raising the absolute level of incentives.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMotivationAdultAfricaCommunity Health WorkersFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchSalaries and Fringe BenefitsVolunteersCommunity health workersIncentivesLow- and middle-income countriesMotivationRemuneration

Identifiers

PMID31324192
PMCPMC6642499
OpenAlexW2963939679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.