Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31324171›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Developing a measure to assess the quality of care transitions for older people.

Eirini Oikonomou, Eleanor Chatburn, Helen Higham, Jenni Murray, Rebecca Lawton, Charles Vincent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development and validation of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure-Older adult care Transitions from the Emergency Department (PROM-OTED) tool.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Understanding data visualization techniques in qualitative studies used to develop and validate patient-reported outcome measures: a targeted literature review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Item development for a patient-reported measure of compassionate healthcare in action.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Unpacking the Cinderella black box of complex intervention development through the Partners at Care Transitions (PACT) programme of research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eirini OikonomouUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK. eirini.oikonomou@psy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8408-9476
Eleanor ChatburnUniversity of Bath, Bath, UK.
Helen HighamUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jenni MurrayYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.
Rebecca LawtonSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Charles VincentUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-1214-20017National Institute for Health Research RP-PG-1214-20017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transition of older patients (over 65 years of age) from hospital to their own home is a time when patients are at high risk. No measure currently exists to assess the experience, quality and safety of care transitions relevant to UK population. We aim to describe the development and initial testing of the Partners at Care Transitions Measure (PACT-M) as a patient-reported questionnaire for evaluation of the quality and safety of care transitions from hospital to home in older patients.

methodsWe used an established measure development procedure which includes conceptualising the components of care transitions, item development, conducting a modified Delphi process and pilot-testing of the PACT-M with patients over 65 years old using telephone administration.

resultsPilot testing of the PACT-M suggests that the components identified cover the issues of most importance to patients. Face validity testing showed that the measure in its current form is acceptable to older patients.

conclusionsThe measure developed in this study shows promise for use by those involved in planning, implementing and evaluating discharge care, and could be used to inform interventions to improve the transition from hospital to home for older patients.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAgedFemaleHumansMalePatient DischargePatient SafetyPilot ProjectsQuality of Health CareReproducibility of ResultsTransitional CareUnited KingdomMeasureOlder patientsPatient safetyQuestionnaireTransitions

Identifiers

PMID31324171
PMCPMC6642522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.