Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31324140›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Visualizing complex feature interactions and feature sharing in genomic deep neural networks.

Ge Liu, Haoyang Zeng, David K Gifford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. InterpretingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. NeuronMotif: Deciphering cis-regulatory codes by layer-wise demixing of deep neural networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Deep learning for inferring transcription factor binding sites.Current opinion in systems biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ge LiuComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Haoyang ZengComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
David K GiffordComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. gifford@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1709-4034

Funding

Deep learning based antibody design using high-throughput affinity testing of synthetic sequencesR01CA218094 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GIFFORD, DAVID K · 2018 to 2024
$2.9M
Integrated Genome Discovery at Single Base Pair ResolutionU01HG007037 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GIFFORD, DAVID K · 2012 to 2015
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218094NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007037NIH HHS R01CA218094NIH HHS U01HG007037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisualization tools for deep learning models typically focus on discovering key input features without considering how such low level features are combined in intermediate layers to make decisions. Moreover, many of these methods examine a network's response to specific input examples that may be insufficient to reveal the complexity of model decision making.

resultsWe present DeepResolve, an analysis framework for deep convolutional models of genome function that visualizes how input features contribute individually and combinatorially to network decisions. Unlike other methods, DeepResolve does not depend upon the analysis of a predefined set of inputs. Rather, it uses gradient ascent to stochastically explore intermediate feature maps to 1) discover important features, 2) visualize their contribution and interaction patterns, and 3) analyze feature sharing across tasks that suggests shared biological mechanism. We demonstrate the visualization of decision making using our proposed method on deep neural networks trained on both experimental and synthetic data. DeepResolve is competitive with existing visualization tools in discovering key sequence features, and identifies certain negative features and non-additive feature interactions that are not easily observed with existing tools. It also recovers similarities between poorly correlated classes which are not observed by traditional methods. DeepResolve reveals that DeepSEA's learned decision structure is shared across genome annotations including histone marks, DNase hypersensitivity, and transcription factor binding. We identify groups of TFs that suggest known shared biological mechanism, and recover correlation between DNA hypersensitivities and TF/Chromatin marks.

conclusionsDeepResolve is capable of visualizing complex feature contribution patterns and feature interactions that contribute to decision making in genomic deep convolutional networks. It also recovers feature sharing and class similarities which suggest interesting biological mechanisms. DeepResolve is compatible with existing visualization tools and provides complementary insights.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningGenomicsNeural Networks, ComputerBase SequenceDatabases, GeneticHistone CodeHistonesTranscription FactorsHistonesTranscription FactorsCombinatorial interactionsDeep neural networksVisualization

Identifiers

PMID31324140
PMCPMC6642501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.