Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31324061›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Learning in Practice: Collaboration Is the Way to Improve Health System Outcomes.

Pieter J Van Dam, Phoebe Griffin, Nicole S Reeves, Sarah J Prior, Bronwyn Paton, Raj Verma, Amelia Giles, Lea Kirkwood, Gregory M Peterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pieter J Van DamSchool of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Tasmania, Australia. pieter.vandam@utas.edu.au.
Phoebe GriffinSchool of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston 7250, Tasmania, Australia.
Nicole S ReevesSchool of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Burnie 7320, Tasmania, Australia.
Sarah J PriorSchool of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Burnie 7320, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5782-9141
Bronwyn PatonAgency for Clinical Innovation, Chatswood 2067, New South Wales, Australia.
Raj VermaAgency for Clinical Innovation, Chatswood 2067, New South Wales, Australia.
Amelia GilesAgency for Clinical Innovation, Chatswood 2067, New South Wales, Australia.
Lea KirkwoodAgency for Clinical Innovation, Chatswood 2067, New South Wales, Australia.
Gregory M PetersonSchool of Pharmacy, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6764-3882

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence suggests that it is challenging for universities to develop workplace-relevant content and curricula by themselves, and this can lead to suboptimal educational outcomes. This paper examines the development, implementation, and evaluation of Australia's first tertiary graduate course in healthcare redesign, a partnership initiative between industry and university. The course not only provides students with an understanding of person-centered sustainable healthcare but also the skills and confidence to design, implement, and evaluate interventions to improve health service delivery. Increasing students' application of new knowledge has been through work-integrated learning, a pedagogy that essentially integrates theory with the practice of workplace application within a purposely designed curriculum. The specific aim of this study was to examine the outcomes of the course after two years, utilizing an anonymous online survey of graduates. Sixty-two graduates (48%) completed the survey. Kirkpatrick's four-level evaluation model was used to analyze the data. The analysis revealed high satisfaction levels in relation to the course content and delivery. Through successful completion of the innovative course, students had increased their knowledge of health system redesign methods and, importantly, the ability to translate that knowledge into everyday practice. Graduates of the clinical redesign course reported that they had been able to transfer their skills and knowledge to others in the workplace and lead further improvement projects.

Indexed as

blended learningeducationhealthcarehealth service improvementindustry partnershiplearning evaluationproject-based learningredesign

Identifiers

PMID31324061
PMCPMC6787743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.