Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31324040›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

The Impact of Pectin Supplementation on Intestinal Barrier Function in Healthy Young Adults and Healthy Elderly.

Ellen Wilms, Daisy M A E Jonkers, Huub F J Savelkoul, Montserrat Elizalde, Lea Tischmann, Paul de Vos, Ad A M Masclee, Freddy J Troost

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. The Roles of Gut Microbiota in the Pathogenesis of Acute Pancreatitis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ellen WilmsDivision Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. e.wilms@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7146-8581
Daisy M A E JonkersDivision Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Huub F J SavelkoulCell Biology and Immunology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, 6708 WD Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6236-7092
Montserrat ElizaldeDivision Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lea TischmannDivision Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Paul de VosTop Institute Food and Nutrition, 6700 AN Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ad A M MascleeDivision Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Freddy J TroostDivision Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0018-5557
University Medical Center · USUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

Top Institute Food and Nutrition Project GH002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intestinal barrier function is suggested to decrease with aging and may be improved by pectin intake. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of four weeks pectin supplementation on gastrointestinal barrier function in vivo and ex vivo in different age groups. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study, 52 healthy young adults (18-40 years) and 48 healthy elderly (65-75 years) received 15 g/day pectin or placebo for four weeks. Pre- and post-intervention, in vivo gastrointestinal permeability by a multisugar test, and defense capacity in mucosal samples were assessed. Sigmoid biopsies were collected post-intervention from subgroups for Ussing chamber experiments and gene transcription of barrier-related genes. Pectin intervention did not affect in vivo gastroduodenal, small intestinal, colonic, and whole gut permeability in young adults nor in elderly (

Indexed as

AgingFunctional FoodNutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdolescentAdultAgedDietary SupplementsFemaleGene Expression RegulationHumansIntestinal MucosaMalePectinsPermeabilityYoung AdultPectinsagingdefensedietary fibergastrointestinalintestinal permeabilitytight junctionstolerance

Identifiers

PMID31324040
PMCPMC6683049
OpenAlexW2959092834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.