Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31323994›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

The Problem of the Low Rates of CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Knock-ins in Plants: Approaches and Solutions.

Serge M Rozov, Natalya V Permyakova, Elena V Deineko

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome Editing Approaches in Flax (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. DNA Methylation in Rice: Mechanisms, Regulatory Roles, and Beyond.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. CRISPR-Cas Gene Editing Technology in Potato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Accelerated Breeding forPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Gene Editing Technologies for Sugarcane Improvement: Opportunities and Limitations.Sugar tech : an international journal of sugar crops & related industries · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Serge M RozovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia. rozov@bionet.nsc.ru.
Natalya V PermyakovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9291-1343
Elena V DeinekoInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Institute of Cytology and Genetics · RUNational Research Tomsk State University · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 17-14-01099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main number of genome editing events in plant objects obtained during the last decade with the help of specific nucleases zinc finger (ZFN), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas are the microindels causing frameshift and subsequent gene knock-out. The knock-ins of genes or their parts, i.e., the insertion of them into a target genome region, are between one and two orders of magnitude less frequent. First and foremost, this is associated with the specific features of the repair systems of higher eukaryotes and the availability of the donor template in accessible proximity during double-strand break (DSB) repair. This review briefs the main repair pathways in plants according to the aspect of their involvement in genome editing. The main methods for increasing the frequency of knock-ins are summarized both along the homologous recombination pathway and non-homologous end joining, which can be used for plant objects.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenome, PlantPlantsPlants, Genetically ModifiedCRISPR/Cas9gene targetinggenome editingHDRknock-in ratesNHEJ

Identifiers

PMID31323994
PMCPMC6651222
OpenAlexW2956425624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.