Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31323939›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019

Artificial Intelligence Prediction Model for the Cost and Mortality of Renal Replacement Therapy in Aged and Super-Aged Populations in Taiwan.

Shih-Yi Lin, Meng-Hsuen Hsieh, Cheng-Li Lin, Meng-Ju Hsieh, Wu-Huei Hsu, Cheng-Chieh Lin, Chung Y Hsu, Chia-Hung Kao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Role of Artificial Intelligence in Kidney Disease.International journal of medical sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shih-Yi LinGraduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan.
Meng-Hsuen HsiehDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Cheng-Li LinManagement Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan.
Meng-Ju HsiehDepartment of Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 061 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5856-3840
Wu-Huei HsuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan.
Cheng-Chieh LinGraduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan.
Chung Y HsuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan.
Chia-Hung KaoGraduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan. d10040@mail.cmuh.org.tw.ORCID 0000-0002-6368-3676

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrognosis of the aged population requiring maintenance dialysis has been reportedly poor. We aimed to develop prediction models for one-year cost and one-year mortality in aged individuals requiring dialysis to assist decision-making for deciding whether aged people should receive dialysis or not.

methodsWe used data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). We identified patients first enrolled in the NHIRD from 2000-2011 for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who underwent regular dialysis. A total of 48,153 Patients with ESRD aged ≥65 years with complete age and sex information were included in the ESRD cohort. The total medical cost per patient (measured in US dollars) within one year after ESRD diagnosis was our study's main outcome variable. We were also concerned with mortality as another outcome. In this study, we compared the performance of the random forest prediction model and of the artificial neural network prediction model for predicting patient cost and mortality.

resultsIn the cost regression model, the random forest model outperforms the artificial neural network according to the mean squared error and mean absolute error. In the mortality classification model, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of both models were significantly better than the null hypothesis area of 0.5, and random forest model outperformed the artificial neural network. Random forest model outperforms the artificial neural network models achieved similar performance in the test set across all data.

conclusionsApplying artificial intelligence modeling could help to provide reliable information about one-year outcomes following dialysis in the aged and super-aged populations; those with cancer, alcohol-related disease, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), previous hip fracture, osteoporosis, dementia, and previous respiratory failure had higher medical costs and a high mortality rate.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence modelingdialysisend-stage renal disease (ESRD)National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD)

Identifiers

PMID31323939
PMCPMC6678226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.