Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31323890›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019

Forage Consumption and Its Effects on the Performance of Growing Swine-Discussed in Relation to European Wild Boar (

M Jordana Rivero, Vicente Rodríguez-Estévez, Silvana Pietrosemoli, Cecilia Carballo, Andrew S Cooke, Anne Grete Kongsted

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Use of Wild Boar (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M Jordana RiveroDepartamento de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Acuícolas, Facultad de Recursos Naturales, Universidad Católica de Temuco, Temuco 4780000, Chile. jordana.rivero-viera@rothamsted.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9045-289X
Vicente Rodríguez-EstévezDepartment of Animal Production, University of Cordoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0148-2892
Silvana PietrosemoliNorth Carolina State University, Animal Science Department, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Cecilia CarballoDepartamento de Producción Animal y Pasturas, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo 11800, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0002-5958-785X
Andrew S CookeRothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK.
Anne Grete KongstedDepartment of Agroecology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/000I0320Natural Environment Research Council NE/N018125/1 LTS-M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to its distinct properties, wild boar meat is considered a highly desirable consumer product, in a market that is expanding. Outdoor production is also favoured by consumers who value animal welfare and environmental sustainability when choosing meat products. There is evidence that farms that include pasture for grazing typically have reduced feeding costs. Such production systems can also be more environmentally sustainable as the input (pasture) is inedible to humans, compared to conventional indoor systems, which use human-edible feeds (e.g., soya). However, some wild boar farms have performed poorly compared to those rearing other swine such as hybrid wild boar and domestic pigs. Diet is central to all livestock production and is likely a significant influencing factor of wild boar performance, both in terms of forage consumption and nutritional composition. Other factors may also influence performance, such as weather, behaviour and grazing management. Wild boar production systems hold their own intrinsic value in a growing marketplace. However, information gathered through the study of wild boar has external applications in informing outdoor domestic pig production systems to encourage the use of pasture as part of the habitat of domestic pigs.

Indexed as

forage intakefree-range pigsgrazing behaviourgrazing pigsoutdoor pig productionsustainability

Identifiers

PMID31323890
PMCPMC6680544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.