Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31323886›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Classification of Postprandial Glycemic Status with Application to Insulin Dosing in Type 1 Diabetes-An In Silico Proof-of-Concept.

Giacomo Cappon, Andrea Facchinetti, Giovanni Sparacino, Pantelis Georgiou, Pau Herrero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Machine learning prediction model for treatment responders in patients with primary biliary cholangitis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giacomo CapponDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova (PD), Italy.
Andrea FacchinettiDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova (PD), Italy.
Giovanni SparacinoDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova (PD), Italy.
Pantelis GeorgiouDepartment of Electrical and Electronical Engineering, Imperial College London, London W5 5SA, UK.
Pau HerreroDepartment of Electrical and Electronical Engineering, Imperial College London, London W5 5SA, UK. pau.herrero@gmail.com.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 689810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the daily management of type 1 diabetes (T1D), determining the correct insulin dose to be injected at meal-time is fundamental to achieve optimal glycemic control. Wearable sensors, such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices, are instrumental to achieve this purpose. In this paper, we show how CGM data, together with commonly recorded inputs (carbohydrate intake and bolus insulin), can be used to develop an algorithm that allows classifying, at meal-time, the post-prandial glycemic status (i.e., blood glucose concentration being too low, too high, or within target range). Such an outcome can then be used to improve the efficacy of insulin therapy by reducing or increasing the corresponding meal bolus dose. A state-of-the-art T1D simulation environment, including intraday variability and a behavioral model, was used to generate a rich in silico dataset corresponding to 100 subjects over a two-month scenario. Then, an extreme gradient-boosted tree (XGB) algorithm was employed to classify the post-prandial glycemic status. Finally, we demonstrate how the XGB algorithm outcome can be exploited to improve glycemic control in T1D through real-time adjustment of the meal insulin bolus. The proposed XGB algorithm obtained good accuracy at classifying post-prandial glycemic status (AUROC = 0.84 [0.78, 0.87]). Consequently, when used to adjust, in real-time, meal insulin boluses obtained with a bolus calculator, the proposed approach improves glycemic control when compared to the baseline bolus calculator. In particular, percentage time in target [70, 180] mg/dL was improved from 61.98 (± 13.89) to 67.00 (± 11.54; p < 0.01) without increasing hypoglycemia.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringComputer SimulationDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Dose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsPostprandial PeriodProof of Concept StudyBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulincontinuous glucose monitoringdecision support systemsgradient boosted treesmachine learningpostprandial glycaemiatype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31323886
PMCPMC6679291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.