Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31323767›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Impact of Adjuvant Modalities on Survival in Patients with Advanced Stage Endometrial Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis from a Tertiary Medical Center.

Yi-Jou Tai, Heng-Cheng Hsu, Ying-Cheng Chiang, Yu-Li Chen, Chi-An Chen, Wen-Fang Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yi-Jou TaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan.
Heng-Cheng HsuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan.
Ying-Cheng ChiangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8958-5222
Yu-Li ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan.
Chi-An ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan.
Wen-Fang ChengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan. wenfangcheng@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adjuvant treatment in advanced-stage (stages III /IV) endometrial carcinomas in terms of tumor grades has not yet been explored. We retrospectively analyzed 194 patients with advanced-stage endometrioid endometrial carcinoma who received surgery, followed by adjuvant therapy, at National Taiwan University Hospital between January 1, 2000 and August 31, 2017. Adjuvant therapies included radiation (RT), chemotherapy alone (CT), and combined modality treatment (CMT: radiation and chemotherapy). The prognostic factors were determined from multivariate survival analyses using Cox regression models. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. The median follow-up was 45.5 months (range: 6.2-207.9). In grade 1/2 endometrioid carcinoma, neither adjuvant CT nor CMT could prolong PFS significantly compared to RT (CT: HR 1.59, 95% CI 0.64-3.97; CMT: HR 2.03, 95% CI 0.72-5.74). Notably, maximal cytoreduction independently improved PFS (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10-0.90). No particular adjuvant treatment provided an OS advantage over the others for grade 1/2 endometrioid carcinomas. However, for grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma, CMT showed OS benefits (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.89) compared to RT and CT. In conclusion, maximal cytoreduction should be the goal in patients with grade 1/2 advanced-stage endometrioid carcinomas. Based on our results, patients with grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas might benefit from adjuvant CMT.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, EndometrioidChemotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProportional Hazards ModelsRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesTaiwanUterusadenocarcinomaadjuvantchemotherapyendometrial neoplasmsendometrioidradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31323767
PMCPMC6678420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.