Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31323684›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2019

Determining Possible Shared Genetic Architecture Between Myopia and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Adriana I Iglesias, Jue Sheng Ong, Anthony P Khawaja, Puya Gharahkhani, Milly S Tedja, Virginie J M Verhoeven, Pieter W M Bonnemaijer, Roger C W Wolfs, Terri L Young, Nomdo M Jansonius and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Shared Genetic Basis Underlying Myopia-Exotropia Comorbidity.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Polymorphisms in TRIB2 and CAPRIN2 Genes Contribute to the Susceptibility to High Myopia-Induced Cataract in Han Chinese Population.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. IMI 2021 Yearly Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Adriana I IglesiasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jue Sheng OngStatistical Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Anthony P KhawajaNational Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust and University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
Puya GharahkhaniStatistical Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Milly S TedjaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Virginie J M VerhoevenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pieter W M BonnemaijerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Roger C W WolfsDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Terri L YoungDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.
Nomdo M JansoniusDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jamie E CraigDepartment of Ophthalmology, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Dwight StambolianDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Cornelia M van DuijnDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stuart MacGregorStatistical Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Caroline C W KlaverDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
International Glaucoma Genetics Consortium (IGGC) and Consortium for Refractive Error and Myopia (CREAM)

Funding

Genetic Epidemiology of Complex TraitsZIAHG200327 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BAILEY-WILSON, JOAN ELLEN · 2009 to 2022
$10.5M
The Molecular Genetics of High MyopiaR01EY014685 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI YOUNG, TERRI LOIS · 2003 to 2017
$8.1M
International Collaborative Twin Study of Refractive and Glaucoma EndophenotypesR01EY018246 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNG, TERRI LOIS · 2007 to 2009
$1.8M
Integrative Data Analysis for Refractive ErrorR01EY024233 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI STAMBOLIAN, DWIGHT EDWARD · 2014 to 2016
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014685NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018246NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine genetic correlations between common myopia and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: We tested the association of myopia polygenic risk scores (PRSs) with POAG and POAG endophenotypes using two studies: the Australian & New Zealand Registry of Advanced Glaucoma (ANZRAG) study comprising 798 POAG cases with 1992 controls, and the Rotterdam Study (RS), a population-based study with 11,097 participants, in which intraocular pressure (IOP) and optic disc parameter measurements were catalogued. PRSs were derived from genome-wide association study meta-analyses conducted by the Consortium for Refractive Error and Myopia (CREAM) and 23andMe. In total, 12 PRSs were constructed and tested. Further, we explored the genetic correlation between myopia, POAG, and POAG endophenotypes by using the linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC) method. Results: We did not find significant evidence for an association between PRS of myopia with POAG (P = 0.81), IOP (P = 0.07), vertical cup-disc ratio (P = 0.42), or cup area (P = 0.25). We observed a nominal association with retinal nerve fiber layer (P = 7.7 × 10-3) and a significant association between PRS for myopia and disc area (P = 1.59 × 10-9). Using the LDSC method, we found a genetic correlation only between myopia and disc area (genetic correlation [RhoG] = -0.12, P = 1.8 × 10-3), supporting the findings of the PRS approach. Conclusions: Using two complementary approaches we found no evidence to support a genetic overlap between myopia and POAG; our results suggest that the comorbidity of these diseases is not influenced by common variants. The association between myopia and optic disc size is well known and validates this methodology.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseRegistriesAgedAustraliaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenome-Wide Association StudyGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIncidenceIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedMyopiaNew ZealandOptic Disk

Identifiers

PMID31323684
PMCPMC6645704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.