Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31323291›Full record

ArticleAnaerobe2019

Phosphorylation and functionality of CdtR in Clostridium difficile.

T W Bilverstone, N P Minton, S A Kuehne

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anaerobe, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Regulatory transcription factors ofCritical reviews in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. An Update onToxins · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T W BilverstoneClostridia Research Group, BBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre (SBRC), School of Life Sciences, Centre for Biomolecular Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
N P MintonClostridia Research Group, BBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre (SBRC), School of Life Sciences, Centre for Biomolecular Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK; NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Electronic address: nigel.minton@nottingham.ac.uk.
S A KuehneOral Microbiology Group, School of Dentistry and Institute of Microbiology and Infection, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B5 7EG, UK.
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0601176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production of TcdA, TcdB and CDT in Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 027, is regulated by the two-component system response regulator CdtR. Despite this, little is known about the signal transduction pathway leading to the activation of CdtR. In this study, we generated R20291ΔPalocΔcdtR model strains expressing CdtR phospho-variants in which our predicted phospho-accepting Asp, Asp61 was mutated for Ala or Glu. The constructs were assessed for their ability to restore CDT production. Dephospho-CdtR-Asp61Ala was completely non-functional and mirrored the cdtR-deletion mutant, whilst phospho-CdtR-Asp61Glu was functional, possessing 38-52% of wild-type activity. Taken together, these data suggest that CdtR is activated by phosphorylation of Asp61. The same principles were applied to assess the function of PCR ribotype 078-derived CdtR, which was shown to be non-functional owing to polymorphisms present within its coding gene. Conversely, polymorphisms present within its promoter region, provide significantly enhanced promoter activity compared with its PCR ribotype 027 counterpart. To ensure our data were representative for each ribotype, we determined that the cdtR nucleotide sequence was conserved in a small library of eight PCR ribotype 027 clinical isolates and nineteen PCR ribotype 078 isolates from clinical and animal origin.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalBacterial ToxinsClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsMutant ProteinsPhosphorylationSequence DeletionSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsBacterial ToxinsMutant ProteinsTranscription FactorsBinary toxinC. difficileCDTCdtRTwo-component systemVirulence

Identifiers

PMID31323291
PMCPMC6699598
OpenAlexW2956221616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.