ArticleJournal of global oncology2019
Microcosting Analysis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treatment in Malawi.
Article in Journal of global oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost-utility Analysis of R-CHOP vs CHOP in Patients with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Systematic Review.Acta medica Philippina · 2026Article
- Cancer immunotherapy clinical trials to support urgently needed access in low- and middle-income countries: a report from the SITC global access and impact committee.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Review
- Safety, efficacy, and affordability of ABVD for Hodgkin lymphoma in Malawi: a prospective cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Update on pathology laboratory development and research in advancing regional cancer care in Malawi.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Guideline Concordance of Treatment and Outcomes Among Adult Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Multinational, Population-Based Cohort.The oncologist · 2023Article
- The case for prioritizing malignant hematology services in low- and middle-income countries.Seminars in hematology · 2023Article
- Comparison of best supportive care, CHOP, or R-CHOP for treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Malawi: a cost-effectiveness analysis.The Lancet. Global health · 2021Article
- Costing Methods Applied to Cancer.Journal of global oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo describe the cost of treating diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in Malawi under the following circumstances: (1) palliation only, (2) first-line cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP), (3) salvage etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (EPIC), and (4) salvage gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX).
methodsWe conducted a microcosting analysis from the health system perspective in the context of a prospective cohort study at a national teaching hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi. Clinical outcomes data were derived from previously published literature from the cohort. Cost data were collected for treatment and 2-year follow-up, reflecting costs incurred by the research institution or referral hospital for goods and services. Costs were collected in Malawian kwacha, inflated and converted to 2017 US dollars.
resultsOn a per-patient basis, palliative care alone cost $728 per person. Total costs for first-line treatment with CHOP chemotherapy was $1,844, of which chemotherapy drugs made up 15%. Separate salvage EPIC and GEMOX cost $2,597 and $3,176, respectively. Chemotherapy drugs accounted for 30% of EPIC and 47% of GEMOX.
conclusionTo our knowledge, this is among the first published efforts to characterize detailed costs of cancer treatment in sub-Saharan Africa. The per-patient cost of first-line treatment of DLBCL in Malawi is low relative to high-income countries, suggesting that investments in fixed-duration, curative-intent DLBCL treatment may be attractive in sub-Saharan Africa. Salvage treatment of relapsed/refractory DLBCL costs much more than first-line therapy. Formal cost-effectiveness modeling for CHOP and salvage treatment in the Malawian and other low-resource settings is needed to inform decision makers about optimal use of resources for cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.