ArticlePsychological science2019
Selection of Visual Objects in Perception and Working Memory One at a Time.
Article in Psychological science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rhythmic sampling and competition of target and distractor representations in visual sensory memory.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026Article
- Event-related potential correlates of visual processing across obsessive-compulsive and anxiety spectrum disorders: A scoping review.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025Article
- Article
- Gaze patterns reflect the retrieval and selection of memories in a context-dependent object location retrieval task.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Recommendations and publication guidelines for studies using frequency domain and time-frequency domain analyses of neural time series.Psychophysiology · 2022Article
- Attentional Prioritization of Complex, Naturalistic Stimuli Maintained in Working-Memory-A Dot-Probe Event-Related Potentials Study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Steady-State Visually Evoked Potentials and Feature-based Attention: Preregistered Null Results and a Focused Review of Methodological Considerations.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2021Review
- Single-session label training alters neural competition between objects and faces.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2021Article
- The Neural Consequences of Attentional Prioritization of Internal Representations in Visual Working Memory.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
How does the content of visual working memory influence the way we process the visual environment? We addressed this question using the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP), which provides a discernible measure of visuocortical activation to multiple stimuli simultaneously. Fifty-six adults were asked to remember a set of two oriented gratings. During the retention interval, two frequency-tagged oriented gratings were presented to probe the visuocortical processing of matching versus mismatching orientations relative to the memory set. Matching probes prompted an increased visuocortical response, whereas mismatching stimuli were suppressed. This suggests that the visual cortex prioritizes attentional selection of memory-relevant features at the expense of non-memory-relevant features. When two memory items were probed simultaneously, visuocortical amplification alternated between the two stimuli at a rate of 3 Hz to 4 Hz, consistent with the rate of attentional sampling of sensory events from the external world. These results suggest a serial, single-item attentional sampling of remembered features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.