Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31322920›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of radiology2019

Spinal metastasis: diagnosis, management and follow-up.

Mahmud Mossa-Basha, Peter C Gerszten, Sten Myrehaug, Nina A Mayr, William Tc Yuh, Pejman Jabehdar Maralani, Arjun Sahgal, Simon S Lo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and other immunotherapies in the treatment of spinal column tumors: A systematic review and Meta-analysis of efficacy, and safety.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Diagnostic errors in spinal metastases: a systematic review of contributing clinical and systemic factors.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Multimodal MRI-based clinical radiomics model for predicting postoperative anemia in patients with spinal metastases.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mahmud Mossa-BashaDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Peter C GersztenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Sten MyrehaugDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON Canada.
Nina A MayrDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
William Tc YuhDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Pejman Jabehdar MaralaniDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Arjun SahgalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON Canada.
Simon S LoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
University of Washington · USSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CAUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spine metastatic disease is an increasingly common occurrence in cancer patients due to improved patient survival. Close proximity of the bony spinal column to the spinal cord limits many conventional treatments for metastatic disease. In the past decade, we have witnessed dramatic advancements in therapies, with improvements in surgical techniques and recent adoption of spine stereotactic radiotherapy techniques leading to improved patient outcomes. Multidisciplinary approaches to patient evaluation, treatment and follow-up are essential. Imaging plays an ever increasing role in disease detection, pre-treatment planning and assessment of patient outcomes. It is important for the radiologist to be familiar with imaging algorithms, best practices for surgery and/or radiotherapy and imaging findings in the post-treatment period that may indicate disease recurrence. In this review, we present a multidisciplinary discussion of spine metastases, with specific focus on pre-treatment imaging, planning, current treatment approaches, and post-treatment assessment.

Indexed as

AgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmobilizationMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPatient Care PlanningPerfusion ImagingPostoperative CareRadiosurgerySpinal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID31322920
PMCPMC6849675
OpenAlexW2963063733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.