Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31322810›Full record

ArticleDiabetes/metabolism research and reviews2020

Nested case-control data analysis using weighted conditional logistic regression in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study: A novel approach.

Hye-Seung Lee, Kristian F Lynch, Jeffrey P Krischer, TEDDY Study Group

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hye-Seung LeeHealth Informatics Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5194-7101
Kristian F LynchHealth Informatics Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4310-4163
Jeffrey P KrischerHealth Informatics Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4526-888X
TEDDY Study Group

Funding

Data Coordinating Center (DCC)for the Consortium for Identification of EnvironmenUC4DK095300 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KRISCHER, JEFFREY P · 2011 to 2011
$56.0M
Data Coordinating CenterU01DK063790 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KRISCHER, JEFFREY P · 2002 to 2006
$50.1M
Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
NIDDK Follow-up on Subjects and Immunological Assessments in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes In The Young Study (TEDDY) (UC4)UC4DK117483 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KRISCHER, JEFFREY P · 2017 to 2020
$30.4M
Establish a Data Coordinating Center (DCC) for the Consortium for Identification UC4DK100238 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KRISCHER, JEFFREY P · 2014 to 2014
$28.9M
The Study of Epigenetics and Infections in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY)UC4DK112243 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KRISCHER, JEFFREY P · 2016 to 2016
$27.0M
Data Coordinating Center (DCC) for the Consortium for Identification of Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) StudyUC4DK106955 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KRISCHER, JEFFREY P · 2015 to 2015
$20.0M
The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in Young (TEDDY0U01DK063863 · NIDDK · HOSPITAL DISTRICT OF SOUTHWEST FINLAND · PI TOPPARI, JORMA · 2003 to 2022
$13.5M
The Environmental Triggers of Diabetes (TEDDY) in SwedenU01DK063861 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LERNMARK, AKE · 2003 to 2022
$13.4M
THE TEDDY STUDY - COLORADO CLINICAL CENTERU01DK063821 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI REWERS, MARIAN J · 2003 to 2022
$12.3M
The TEDDY Study: Georgia/Florida Clinical CenterU01DK063865 · NIDDK · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA (MCG) · PI MCINDOE, RICHARD A. · 2003 to 2022
$12.3M
UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000064 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000064NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NIDDK NIH HHS HHSN267200700014CNIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063790NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063821NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063829NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063836NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063861NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063863NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063865NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK063821NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK063829NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK063836NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK063861NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK063863NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK063865NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK095300NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK100238NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK106955NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK112243NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK117483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA nested case-control (NCC) design within a prospective cohort study can realize substantial benefits for biomarker studies. In this context, it is natural to consider the sample availability in the selection of controls to minimize data loss when implementing the design. However, this violates the randomness required for selection, and it leads to biased analyses. An inverse probability weighting may improve the analysis, but the current approach using weighted Cox regression fails to maintain the benefits of NCC design.

methodsThis paper introduces weighted conditional logistic regression. We illustrate our proposed analysis using data recently investigated in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY). Considering the potential data loss, the TEDDY NCC design was moderately selective in its selection of controls. A data-driven simulation study was performed to present the bias correction when a nonrandom control selection was ignored in the analysis.

resultsThe TEDDY data analysis showed that the standard analysis using conditional logistic regression estimated the parameter: -0.015 (-0.023, -0.007). The biased estimate using Cox regression was -0.011 (95% confidence interval: -0.019, -0.003). Weighted Cox regression estimated -0.013 (-0.026, 0.0004). The proposed weighted conditional logistic regression estimated -0.020 (-0.033, -0.007), showing a stronger negative effect size than the one using conditional logistic regression. The simulation study also showed that the standard estimate of β ignoring the nonrandom control selection tends to be greater than the true β (ie, positive relative biases).

conclusionWeighted conditional logistic regression can enhance the analysis by offering flexibility in the selection of controls, while maintaining the matching.

Indexed as

EnvironmentModels, StatisticalSocial Determinants of HealthAdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolComputer SimulationDiabetes MellitusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMalePatient SelectionPrognosisinverse probability weightingnested case-control designprospective cohort studyselection biasweighted conditional logistic regression

Identifiers

PMID31322810
PMCPMC6952534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.