ArticleOncology reports2019
Identification and characterization of sexual dimorphism‑linked gene expression profile in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Oncology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex and base excision repair as key susceptibility factors for alkylation-induced mutations, toxicity and hepatic cancer.DNA repair · 2026Article
- The importance of sex dimorphism in liver metabolism and progressive liver diseases.Biology of sex differences · 2025Review
- Adrenocortical carcinoma survival gene HMMR was identified as being targeted by fluorouracil and epirubicin using a gene coexpression network-based drug repositioning strategy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sex and Alkyladenine DNA Glycosylase Expression are Key Susceptibility Factors for NDMA-induced Mutations, Toxicity, and Cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Overexpression of tousled-like kinase 2 predicts poor prognosis in HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma patients after radical resection.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- [CDK1, CCNB1 and NDC80 are associated with prognosis and progression of hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma: a bioinformatic analysis].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2021Article
- Sex-dependent dynamics of metabolism in primary mouse hepatocytes.Archives of toxicology · 2021Article
- A highly expressed mRNA signature for predicting survival in patients with stage I/II non-small-cell lung cancer after operation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Sex-Biased Molecular Signature for Overall Survival of Liver Cancer Patients.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2020Review
- Distribution and clinical relevance of phospholipids in hepatocellular carcinoma.Hepatology international · 2020Article
- Genome-Wide Sex and Gender Differences in Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Genetic factors contributing to extensive variability of sex-specific hepatic gene expression in Diversity Outbred mice.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is sexually disparate in humans, with a significantly increased prevalence in males. The molecular mechanisms by which the inhibition or development of liver cancer are facilitated require further investigation with regard to sex factors affecting disease progression. In the present study, functional signatures of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened in female and male tumors via bioinformatics analysis. The following gene chip expression profiles were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus: GSE19665, GSE23342 and GSE9843. They comprised cancerous and non‑cancerous tissue from patients with HCC and included critical sex features. Further evaluation of selected DEGs in the two sexual groups was performed via hierarchical clustering analysis. Venn diagram and functional protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network analyses were performed. Survival analysis of patients with differences in gene expression levels was subsequently performed using the Kaplan‑Meier Plotter database. Certain identified DEGs were common in female and male tumor samples, whereas others exhibited a sexually‑biased expression profile. Gene Ontology revealed that the cell cycle module 'biological process' was enriched in tumors derived from both sexes, whereas the metabolic pathways and drug metabolism modules were only significantly enriched in cancer tissues from male subjects. A number of hub DEGs in the cell cycle and p53 signaling pathways were involved in significant protein‑protein interaction (PPI) modules, including CDK1 and CCNB1. These DEGs were upregulated in tumors derived from female subjects compared with those derived from male subjects, and could be used as markers of poor prognosis in male patients. Other genes, such as CYP3A4 and SERPINA4, were identified in metabolic pathways, and were downregulated in male compared with female subjects. These genes were associated with a decreased survival rate. The data demonstrated that sex differences in physiology may regulate the levels of gene expression and/or activity, including gene function associated with oncogenesis and the outcomes of liver cancer. Additional surveys are required to explore in detail the molecular mechanisms underlying the differences in gene expression between the two sexes during the development of liver cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.