Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31322134›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2019

Using a Triple Aim Approach to Implement "Less-is-More Together" and Smarter Medicine Strategies in an Interprofessional Outpatient Setting: Protocol for an Observational Study.

Monique Lehky Hagen, René Julen, Pierre-Alain Buchs, Anne-Laure Kaufmann, Jean-Michel Gaspoz, Henk Verloo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monique Lehky Hagen *Valais Medical Society, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2734-7448
René Julen *Pharmavalais, Brig-Glis, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9678-3307
Pierre-Alain Buchs *Pharmavalais, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9405-5613
Anne-Laure Kaufmann *Institute of Health, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Sierre, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3282-1404
Jean-Michel Gaspoz *Clinique des Grangettes, Chêne-Bougeries, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7574-1290
Henk Verloo *School of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Valais (HES-SO Valais-Wallis), Sion, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5375-3255
HES-SO Valais-Wallis · CHUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased awareness of the world's problematic growing health care expenditure and health care shortages requires sustainable use of available resources. To promote cultural changes in medical mindsets, societies representing medical specialties have developed new Choosing Wisely strategies. The Valais Medical Society and the Valais Pharmacy Association have developed an interprofessional collaboration project entitled "Less-is-more Together-PPI" to analyze and optimize change management practices focusing on the prescription and deprescription of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

objectiveThis study aims to enhance interprofessional collaboration between physicians, pharmacists, and patients to optimize PPI use, avoid unnecessary treatments and improve therapeutic adherence to indicated therapies, and to analyze hindrances and facilitators to implementing interprofessional Less-is-more strategies in the field.

methodsHome-dwelling adults domiciled in Valais and prescribed PPIs in the last 6 months will be invited to participate in this observational study. The studied subpopulation will be constituted of consenting patients whose physicians and pharmacists also voluntarily agree to participate. The process of collecting, pooling, transmitting, evaluating, and protecting data has been validated by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Canton Vaud.

resultsThe Primary Triple Aim outcome measures will be (1) population health: patient's assessment of their own health, functional status, and disease burden using a monthly questionnaire for 6 months; Behavioral/physiological factors will be investigated using a final questionnaire at 6 months, (2) experience of care: assessment using a final questionnaire for participating patients, pharmacists and physicians, and an analysis of negative/positive experiences via 6 follow-up questionnaires, and (3) Per capita cost: participants' fluctuating or decreasing PPI intake (number of pills/dosage) and an analysis of participants' different categories following their medical prescription, in relation to possible bias effects on the overall drug intake of the population studied. Secondary outcomes will be participation rates; patient, physician, and pharmacist follow-up; and evaluations of participants' experiences and their perceived benefits, as well as whether the interprofessional process can be improved.

conclusionsThis project seeks a deeper understanding of how Less-is-more and smarter-medicine strategies are perceived by patients and health care providers in their daily lives in a very specific context. It will reveal some of the hindrances to and facilitators for efficient cultural change toward a more sustainable health care system. The results will be useful to optimize and scale up further Choosing Wisely approaches. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/13896.

Indexed as

deprescriptionevidence-based medicinefamily physicianspharmacistspolypharmacyprescription

Identifiers

PMID31322134
PMCPMC6670276
OpenAlexW2947213028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.