Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31322132›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2019

Identification of Knee Osteoarthritis Based on Bayesian Network: Pilot Study.

Bo Sheng, Liang Huang, Xiangbin Wang, Jie Zhuang, Lihua Tang, Chao Deng, Yanxin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bo ShengCollege of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fujian, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1236-6504
Liang HuangDepartment of Exercise Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0020-3046
Xiangbin WangCollege of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fujian, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1293-8755
Jie ZhuangSchool of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2442-7418
Lihua TangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9031-4190
Chao DengSchool of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5092-5277
Yanxin ZhangCollege of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fujian, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7638-1669

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly identification of knee osteoarthritis (OA) can improve treatment outcomes and reduce medical costs. However, there are major limitations among existing classification or prediction models, including abstract data processing and complicated dataset attributes, which hinder their applications in clinical practice.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to propose a Bayesian network (BN)-based classification model to classify people with knee OA. The proposed model can be treated as a prescreening tool, which can provide decision support for health professionals.

methodsThe proposed model's structure was based on a 3-level BN structure and then retrained by the Bayesian Search (BS) learning algorithm. The model's parameters were determined by the expectation-maximization algorithm. The used dataset included backgrounds, the target disease, and predictors. The performance of the model was evaluated based on classification accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV); it was also compared with other well-known classification models. A test was also performed to explore whether physical fitness tests could improve the performance of the proposed model.

resultsA total of 249 elderly people between the ages of 60 and 80 years, living in the Kongjiang community (Shanghai), were recruited from April to September 2007. A total of 157 instances were adopted as the dataset after data preprocessing. The experimental results showed that the results of the proposed model were higher than, or equal to, the mean scores of other classification models: .754 for accuracy, .78 for AUC, .78 for specificity, and .73 for sensitivity. The proposed model provided .45 for PPV and .92 for NPV at the prevalence of 20%. The proposed model also showed a significant improvement when compared with the traditional BN model: 6.3% increase in accuracy (from .709 to .754), 4.0% increase in AUC (from .75 to .78), 6.8% increase in specificity (from .73 to .78), 5.8% increase in sensitivity (from .69 to .73), 15.4% increase in PPV (from .39 to .45), and 2.2% increase in NPV (from .90 to .92). Furthermore, the test results showed that the performance of the proposed model could be largely enhanced through physical fitness tests in 3 evaluation indices: 10.6% increase in accuracy (from .682 to .754), 16.4% increase in AUC (from .67 to .78), and 30.0% increase in specificity (from .60 to .78).

conclusionsThe proposed model presents a promising method to classify people with knee OA when compared with other classification models and the traditional BN model. It could be implemented in clinical practice as a prescreening tool for knee OA, which would not only improve the quality of health care for elderly people but also reduce overall medical costs.

Indexed as

Bayesian networkclassificationhealth services for the agedkneeosteoarthritisphysical fitness

Identifiers

PMID31322132
PMCPMC6670282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.