Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31322124›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Patient Attitudes About Viewing Their Radiology Images Online: Preintervention Survey.

Ciarra Halaska, Peter Sachs, Kate Sanfilippo, Chen-Tan Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ciarra Halaska *UCHealth, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8523-963X
Peter Sachs *Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3555-1497
Kate Sanfilippo *UCHealth, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4481-7296
Chen-Tan Lin *University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8678-7945
University of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Colorado Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough patient data is available through electronic portals, little information exists about the benefits and/or challenges of providing patients with online access to their radiology images.

objectiveThe aims of this quality improvement project were to understand patient attitudes toward being able to view their radiology images online and determine how information should be presented to ensure the images are helpful to the patients, rather than causing confusion and anxiety.

methodsAn online survey of consumers was conducted to evaluate attitudes toward online access to personal radiological images.

resultsA total of 105 responses were received from 686 community members (15.3%). Of 105 consumers, 94 (89.5%) reported a desire to have access to the radiology images within their online patient portal; 86.7% (91/105) believed it would help them better understand their medical conditions and 81.0% (85/105) said this would help them feel more in control of their care. Most respondents (74/105, 70.5%) said it would help them feel reassured that their doctor was doing the right thing, and 63.8% (67/105) said it would increase their level of trust in their doctor. Among surveyed patients, 78.1% (82/105) valued viewing their radiology images online, while 92.4% (97/105) valued their online radiology reports. Most patients (69/105, 65.7%) wished to discuss their results with their ordering clinician, 29.5% (31/105) wished to discuss with their interpreting radiologist, and 3.8% (4/105) wished to share their images on social media. The biggest potential concern among 23.8% (25/105) was that the images would be confusing.

conclusionsA large majority of surveyed patients desired the ability to view their radiology images online and anticipated many benefits and few risks. Health care organizations with electronic health records and online patient portals should consider augmenting their existing portals with this highly desired feature. To avoid the biggest patient concern, radiology reports should accompany images. Patients wanted to discuss their results with their ordering physician and their interpreting radiologist. Some even would like to share results on social media. Further research on the actual experience with such a tool will be needed.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInternetMaleMiddle AgedPatient PortalsRadiographySurveys and Questionnairesconnected healthelectronic health recordsinformation transparency with patientsonline patient-physician communicationonline patient portalradiology imagessecond opinionsocial mediatest result management

Identifiers

PMID31322124
PMCPMC6670277
OpenAlexW2952790421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.