Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31322099›Full record

ArticlePrehospital and disaster medicine2019

Crash Telemetry-Based Injury Severity Prediction is Equivalent to or Out-Performs Field Protocols in Triage of Planar Vehicle Collisions.

Katherine He, Peng Zhang, Stewart C Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prehospital and disaster medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mechanism of injury and special considerations as predictive of serious injury: A systematic review.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine He1.Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital,Boston, Massachusetts,USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6402-8537
Peng Zhang3.Department of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, University of Michigan,Ann Arbor, Michigan,USA.
Stewart C Wang3.Department of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, University of Michigan,Ann Arbor, Michigan,USA.

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Scott Soleimanpour · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Developing Personalized Treatment for Diabetes Through Novel Imaging MethodsK01DK106296 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZHANG, PENG · 2016 to 2018
$465k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK106296NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith the increasing availability of vehicle telemetry technology, there is great potential for Advanced Automatic Collision Notification (AACN) systems to improve trauma outcomes by detecting patients at-risk for severe injury and facilitating early transport to trauma centers.

methodsNational Automotive Sampling System Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS) data from 1999-2013 were used to construct a logistic regression model (injury severity prediction [ISP] model) predicting the probability that one or more occupants in planar, non-rollover motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) would have Injury Severity Score (ISS) 15+ injuries. Variables included principal direction of force (PDOF), change in velocity (Delta-V), multiple impacts, presence of any older occupant (≥55 years old), presence of any female occupant, presence of right-sided passenger, belt use, and vehicle type. The model was validated using medical records and 2008-2011 crash data from AACN-enabled Michigan (USA) vehicles identified from OnStar (OnStar Corporation; General Motors; Detroit, Michigan USA) records. To compare the ISP to previously established protocols, a literature search was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of first responder identification of ISS 15+ for MVC occupants.

resultsThe study population included 924 occupants in 836 crash events. The ISP model had a sensitivity of 72.7% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 41%-91%) and specificity of 93% (95% CI 92%-95%) for identifying ISS 15+ occupants injured in planar MVCs. The current standard 2006 Field Triage Decision Scheme (FTDS) was 56%-66% sensitive and 75%-88% specific in identifying ISS 15+ patients.

conclusionsThe ISP algorithm comparably is more sensitive and more specific than current field triage in identifying MVC patients at-risk for ISS 15+ injuries. This real-world field study shows telemetry data transmitted before dispatch of emergency medical systems can be helpful to quickly identify patients who require urgent transfer to trauma centers.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficAdultAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualEmergency Medical Service Communication SystemsFemaleHumansInjury Severity ScoreLogistic ModelsMaleMichiganMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSurvival AnalysisAACN: Advanced Automotive Collision NotificationAbdomenACS COT: American College of Surgeons Committee on Traumaand Speech CriteriaCDC: Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCRAMS: CirculationEmergency Medical Servicesfield triageFTDS: Field Triage Decision SchemeGPS: Global Positioning Systeminjury severityISP: injury severity predictionISS: Injury Severity ScoreMotorMVC: motor vehicle collisionNASS-CDS: National Automotive Sampling System Crashworthiness Data SystemPDOF: principal direction of forcePHI: Prehospital IndexRespirationSMUR: Service Mobile d’Urgence et Reanimationtrauma centerT-RTS: Revised Trauma Score for TriageTS: Trauma Scorevehicle telemetry

Identifiers

PMID31322099
PMCPMC7227169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.