Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31321918›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2019

Sustained high HIV case-finding through index testing and partner notification services: experiences from three provinces in Zimbabwe.

Nyikadzino Mahachi, Auxilia Muchedzi, Taurayi A Tafuma, Peter Mawora, Liz Kariuki, Bazghina-Werq Semo, Moses H Bateganya, Tendai Nyagura, Getrude Ncube, Mike B Merrigan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nyikadzino MahachiFHI 360, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0002-5793-3800
Auxilia MuchedziFHI 360, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Taurayi A TafumaFHI 360, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Peter MaworaFHI 360, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Liz KariukiFHI 360, Pretoria, South Africa.
Bazghina-Werq SemoFHI 360, Washington, DC, USA.
Moses H BateganyaFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Tendai NyaguraU.S. Agency for International Development, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Getrude NcubeMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Mike B MerriganFHI 360, Washington, DC, USA.
Otto N ChabikuliFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Mulamuli MpofuFHI 360, Pretoria, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSeveral countries in southern Africa have made significant progress towards reaching the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS goal of ensuring that 90% of people living with HIV are aware of their status. In Zimbabwe, progress towards this "first 90" was estimated at 73% in 2016. To reach the remaining people living with HIV who have undiagnosed infection, the Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Care has been promoting index testing and partner notification services (PNS). We describe the implementation of index testing and PNS under the Zimbabwe HIV Care and Treatment (ZHCT) project and the resulting uptake, HIV positivity rate and links to HIV treatment.

methodsThe ZHCT project has been implemented since March 2016, covering a total of 12 districts in three provinces. To assess the project's performance on index testing, we extracted data on HIV testing from the district health information system (DHIS 2) from March 2016 to May 2018, validated it using service registers and calculated monthly HIV positivity rates using Microsoft Excel. Data were disaggregated by district, province, sex and service delivery point. We used SPSS to assess for statistical differences in paired monthly HIV positivity rates by sex, testing site, and province.

resultsThe average HIV positivity rate rose from 10% during the first six months of implementation to more than 30% by August 2016 and was sustained above 30% through May 2018. The overall facility HIV positivity rate was 4.1% during the same period. The high HIV positivity rate was achieved for both males and females (mean monthly HIV positivity rate of 31.3% for males and 33.7% for females), with females showing significantly higher positivity compared to males (p < 0.001). The ZHCT mean monthly HIV positivity rate from index testing (32.6%) was significantly higher than that achieved through provider-initiated testing and counselling and other facility HIV testing modalities (4.1%, p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe ZHCT project has demonstrated successes in implementing index testing and PNS by attaining a high HIV positivity rate sustained over the study period. As the country moves towards HIV epidemic control, index testing and PNS are critical strategies for targeted HIV case identification.

Indexed as

Disease NotificationSexual PartnersAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCounselingFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSerologic TestsYoung AdultZimbabweHIVHIV positivityindex testingpartner notification servicesZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID31321918
PMCPMC6639671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.