ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019
Robust 3D Bloch-Siegert based
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- MC BTS: Simultaneously Resolving Magnetization Transfer Effect and Relaxation for Multiple Components.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Evidence for divergent cortical organisation in Parkinson's disease and Lewy Body Dementia.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Fast and reliable quantitative measures of white matter development with magnetic resonance fingerprinting.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Mitigating the impact of flip angle and orientation dependence in single compartment R2* estimates via 2-pool modeling.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Empirical transmit field bias correction of T1w/T2w myelin maps.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- A multi-inversion multi-echo spin and gradient echo echo planar imaging sequence with low image distortion for rapid quantitative parameter mapping and synthetic image contrasts.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Imperfect spoiling in variable flip angle TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Robust 3D Bloch-Siegert basedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeQuantitative MRI applications, such as mapping the T THEORY AND
methodsIt is shown here by means of simulation and experiments that the amplitude of the error depends on MR pulse sequence parameters, such as repetition time and radiofrequency spoiling increment, but more problematically, on the intrinsic properties, T
resultsIn line with simulations, phantom and in vivo experiments confirmed that the general linear model-based method removed the dependency on tissue properties and pulse sequence settings.
conclusionThe general linear model-based method is recommended as a more accurate approach to BSS-based
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.