Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31321765›Full record

Trial reportActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2019

Multicenter, phase III trials on the contraceptive efficacy, tolerability and safety of a new drospirenone-only pill.

Santiago Palacios, Enrico Colli, Pedro-Antonio Regidor

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Pregnancy Considerations in Tetralogy of Fallot.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Low Thrombin Generation in Users of a Contraceptive Containing Estetrol and Drospirenone.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Article
  17. Progestogen-only oral contraceptives.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Article
  18. New Contraception Update - Annovera, Phexxi, Slynd, and Twirla.Current obstetrics and gynecology reports · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Hormonal Contraceptives and Dermatology.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Santiago PalaciosInstituto Palacios, Salud y Medicina de la Mujer, Madrid, Spain.
Enrico ColliExeltis HealthCare Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Pedro-Antonio RegidorExeltis Europe, Ismaning, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9551-2847
Instituto Palacios · ESMadrid Health Service · ESUniversity of Applied Sciences Europe · DE

Funding

Insud Pharma
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionApproximately 100 million women currently use combined oral contraceptives. Combined oral contraceptives use is associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolic events and cardiovascular disease. Progestin-only pills do not increase the risk of venous thromboembolic events, stroke and myocardial infarction but are associated with a poor cycle control. A novel estrogen-free pill containing only drospirenone (DRSP) was developed to improve bleeding pattern, tolerability and acceptance without increasing venous thromboembolic events risks in contraception. MATERIAL AND

methodsTwo prospective, multicenter Phase III studies in healthy women aged 18-45 years were performed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of a drospirenone-only pill in a regimen of 24 days of 4 mg of drospirenone tablets followed by 4 days of placebo. A total of 1571 women (14 329 exposure cycles) were analyzed: 713 patients in the 13-cycle study 1 with 7638 exposure cycles and 858 patients in the 9-cycle study 2 with 6691 exposure cycles. The primary endpoint was the overall Pearl index, calculated for each study separately, and for both pooled. As main secondary efficacy endpoint, the "method failure Pearl index" including all pregnancies during "perfect medication cycles" was evaluated. EudraCT registration numbers: 2010-021787-15 & 2011-002396-42.

resultsCalculations on pooled studies 1 and 2 with 1571 patients gave an overall Pearl index (based on 14 329 cycles) of 0.7258 (95% CI 0.3133 to 1.4301). No single case of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism and only one case of hyperkalemia were reported. Additional information such as laboratory parameters, body mass index, bodyweight, heart rate and blood pressure showed no statistically significant changes due to the treatment.

conclusionsThis is the first report of a new drospirenone-only oral contraceptive providing clinical efficacy similar to combined oral contraceptives, with a good safety profile, and favorable cycle control.

Indexed as

AdultAndrostenesContraceptives, OralFemaleHumansHyperkalemiaMetrorrhagiaPregnancyPregnancy RateProspective StudiesPulmonary EmbolismTreatment FailureVenous ThrombosisYoung AdultAndrostenesContraceptives, Oraldrospirenonedrospirenonedrospirenone-only pillestrogen-free contraceptionPearl indexvenous thromboembolic events

Identifiers

PMID31321765
PMCPMC7186823
OpenAlexW2963023874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.