Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31321758›Full record

ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2020

Laser photocoagulation therapy for thyroid nodules: long-term outcome and predictors of efficacy.

F Magri, S Chytiris, M Molteni, L Croce, F Coperchini, M Rotondi, R Fonte, L Chiovato

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

F MagriUnit of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Laboratory for Endocrine Disruptors, Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, University of Pavia, Via S. Maugeri 4, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
S ChytirisUnit of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Laboratory for Endocrine Disruptors, Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, University of Pavia, Via S. Maugeri 4, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
M MolteniUnit of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Laboratory for Endocrine Disruptors, Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, University of Pavia, Via S. Maugeri 4, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
L CroceUnit of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Laboratory for Endocrine Disruptors, Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, University of Pavia, Via S. Maugeri 4, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
F CoperchiniUnit of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Laboratory for Endocrine Disruptors, Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, University of Pavia, Via S. Maugeri 4, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
M RotondiUnit of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Laboratory for Endocrine Disruptors, Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, University of Pavia, Via S. Maugeri 4, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
R FonteUnit of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Laboratory for Endocrine Disruptors, Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, University of Pavia, Via S. Maugeri 4, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
L ChiovatoUnit of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Laboratory for Endocrine Disruptors, Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, University of Pavia, Via S. Maugeri 4, 27100, Pavia, Italy. luca.chiovato@icsmaugeri.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of interstitial laser photocoagulation (ILP) ablation of thyroid nodules during a 6-year follow-up period and to identify possible predictors of the final outcome.

methodsForty-three outpatients (38 women) were assigned to ILP therapy. The study group included euthyroid patients with benign thyroid nodules. Thyroid size, nodule volume and features, and autoimmune test were collected at baseline. Patients underwent US control after the ILP procedure and 1 month, 6 months, 12 months later and then annually.

resultsDuring the follow-up, two distinct groups of patients emerged: the responders (N = 33) and the non-responder (N = 10) ones to ILP. In the responder group, the nodule volume significantly decreased during the follow-up, but a trend toward a slight increase in nodule volume was recorded up to the end of follow-up. No significant decrease in nodule volume was observed in the non-responder group. Neither baseline clinical nor demographic features were significantly different between responders and non-responders groups. In the whole group of patients, the energy delivered per mL of nodule tissue was significantly correlated with the percent volume decrease at the end of follow-up.

conclusionsInterstitial laser photocoagulation is a safe technique able to reduce byabout 50% the volume of benign thyroid nodules in the majority of treated patients. However, due to the great variability of results, an active follow-up is required. The only independent predictor of ILP outcome is the energy delivered per mL of nodule tissue.

Indexed as

FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaser TherapyLight CoagulationMaleMiddle AgedThyroid NoduleTreatment OutcomeInterstitial laser photocoagulationTherapeutic outcomeThyroid noduleUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.