Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31321720›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019

Ecological footprint, urbanization, and energy consumption in South Africa: including the excluded.

Solomon Nathaniel, Ozoemena Nwodo, Abdulrauf Adediran, Gagan Sharma, Muhammad Shah, Ngozi Adeleye

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Urbanization, Human Inequality, and Material Consumption.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Validation of environmental Philips curve in Pakistan: a fresh insight through ARDL technique.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Solomon NathanielDepartment of Economics, University of Lagos, Akoka, Nigeria. nathaniel_solomon21@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7623-9526
Ozoemena NwodoDepartment of Economics, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Abdulrauf AdediranDepartment of Finance and Investment Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Gagan SharmaUniversity School of Management Studies, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, New Delhi, India.
Muhammad ShahDepartment of Economics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ngozi AdeleyeDepartment of Economics, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study explores the relationship between ecological footprint, urbanization, and energy consumption by applying the ARDL estimation technique on data spanning 1965-2014 for South Africa. After applying the unit root test that accounts for a break in the data, the Bayer and Hanck (J Time Ser Anal 34:83-95, 2013) combined cointegration test affirms cointegrating relationship among the variables. Findings further reveal that economic growth and financial development exact a deteriorating impact on the environment in the short run. However, the same was not true for both energy use and urbanization. While urbanization and energy use promote environmental quality in the long run, financial development and economic growth degrade it further. The long-run findings of our study are confirmed to be robust as reported by the fully modified OLS (FMOLS), dynamic OLS (DOLS), and the canonical cointegrating regression (CCR) estimates. The direction of causality supports the energy-led growth hypothesis for South Africa. Policy outcomes and directions, and the possibility of promoting sustainable growth without degrading the environment are discussed.

Indexed as

EcologyEconomic DevelopmentSouth AfricaUrbanizationEcological footprintEconomic growthEnergy useSouth AfricaUrbanization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.